The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the vivo iQOO Z7x and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one reigns supreme? This detailed comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and overall more premium feel. While the iQOO Z7x boasts impressive 80W charging, the Poco F5's performance and display justify its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 34 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Tropical Blue, Metallic Grey, Orange | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | V2272A | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
vivo iQOO Z7x
- Fast 80W Charging
- Large Display
- Competitive Price
- Good Battery Life
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Inferior Camera
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Excellent Performance
- Good Battery Life
- Slower Charging than iQOO Z7x
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Poco F5's display is a clear winner. It boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 963 nits compared to the iQOO Z7x (estimated around 500-600 nits), resulting in better outdoor visibility. The Poco F5 also has an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting superior image quality. The iQOO Z7x's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the Poco F5.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco F5 is expected to have a superior camera system due to the more powerful processor and likely better image processing algorithms. The Poco F5 likely offers better dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. Specific camera specs are missing for both, but the chipset advantage heavily favors the Poco F5.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the iQOO Z7x's Snapdragon 695. The Gen 2 offers significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, leading to smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness. The iQOO Z7x is capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings of 118h. The iQOO Z7x's 80W charging is faster, reaching 70% in 34 minutes, compared to the Poco F5's 67W charging (100% in 46 minutes). However, the Poco F5's active use score of 11:52h suggests efficient power management.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z7x is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a large display on a tight budget. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is the better choice for those seeking a smoother, faster experience with a vibrant display and a more capable camera system, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset.
❓ Does the iQOO Z7x charge faster?
Yes, the iQOO Z7x has faster 80W charging compared to the Poco F5's 67W charging.
❓ Which phone has a better display?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 has a brighter and more vibrant display with a higher peak brightness and a superior contrast ratio.