iQOO Z7x vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a vibrant display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its 10:28h active use score and 1073 nits peak brightness significantly outperform the iQOO Z7x, despite the Z7x’s impressive 80W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z7x | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 34 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tropical Blue, Metallic Grey, Orange | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2272A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo iQOO Z7x
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Competitive 5G connectivity with Snapdragon 695
- Value-focused price point
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright and vibrant 1073 nit display
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Slower peak charging speed than the iQOO Z7x
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This translates to excellent visibility outdoors, a common pain point for budget phones. While the iQOO Z7x’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of this brightness level. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely offers superior viewing angles and color accuracy, enhancing the overall user experience for media consumption and everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, given the market positioning, it’s unlikely either phone features a flagship-level camera system. The focus should be on practical image quality in good lighting conditions. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Edge 40 Neo’s processor gives it a slight advantage in image processing capabilities.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The iQOO Z7x utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a dual-core Kryo 660 Gold setup clocked at 2.2 GHz alongside six Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo, however, employs the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) with a more potent configuration: two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The higher clock speeds and more advanced core architecture of the Dimensity 7030 suggest a noticeable performance edge in demanding tasks and gaming, despite both being 6nm chips. The Edge 40 Neo is likely to handle multitasking and graphically intensive applications more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h active use score and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This indicates a well-optimized system and efficient power management. The iQOO Z7x compensates with its 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% charge in just 34 minutes. While the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging reaches 50% in 15 minutes, the Z7x’s faster peak charging speed is beneficial for quick top-ups. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery life reduces the need for frequent charging, making it more convenient for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z7x if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to trade some battery endurance and display quality for it. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value a brighter, more usable display in all lighting conditions and longer battery life between charges, making it a better choice for power users and those who travel frequently.