The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Z7s and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The iQOO Z7s focuses on delivering a solid Qualcomm-powered experience, while the Edge 40 Neo aims to impress with its faster charging and potentially more refined software. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use score outweigh the iQOO Z7s’s slightly lower price point. However, those seeking a potentially more optimized gaming experience on a tighter budget might find the iQOO Z7s appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 22 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 22 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 24 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Norway Blue, Pacific Night | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | I2223 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo iQOO Z7s
- Potentially lower price point
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G offers stable performance
- Established Qualcomm software ecosystem
- Slower 44W charging
- Limited battery life data
- Display likely less bright than Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Impressive 10:28h active use battery life
- Brighter 1073 nits display
- MediaTek Dimensity 7030 may have less software optimization
- Potentially higher price point
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the iQOO Z7s. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the display’s impact on overall power consumption should be considered. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from more advanced power management features, contributing to its longer battery life. We lack information on the iQOO Z7s’s panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) and refresh rate, making a complete assessment difficult, but the Edge 40 Neo clearly has the advantage in raw brightness.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo/Video' are missing for both devices, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 40 Neo likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Motorola often prioritizes image processing and software features. The iQOO Z7s, while capable, likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience without extensive features. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance, but the Edge 40 Neo’s higher price point suggests a more capable camera module.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a theoretical CPU performance advantage over the iQOO Z7s’s Snapdragon 695 5G (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold). The Cortex-A78 architecture is generally more efficient and powerful than the Kryo 660 Gold. However, the Snapdragon 695 is known for its stable performance and optimized power efficiency. The iQOO Z7s may benefit from Qualcomm’s software optimizations. The Edge 40 Neo’s GPU is also likely to provide a more substantial boost in graphics performance, potentially leading to smoother gaming experiences, though real-world performance will depend on thermal throttling.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h active use score and 80-hour endurance rating demonstrate a clear advantage in battery life over the iQOO Z7s, which lacks comparable data. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging significantly outperforms the iQOO Z7s’s 44W charging, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes versus 24 minutes. This faster charging is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While the iQOO Z7s may have a slightly larger battery capacity (unspecified), the Edge 40 Neo’s superior power efficiency and faster charging make it the more practical choice for all-day use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z7s if you need a reliable 5G smartphone with a focus on Qualcomm’s established chipset and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, incredibly fast 68W charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display experience, even if it means opting for a MediaTek processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chip, thermal management is crucial. Motorola typically employs effective cooling solutions, but sustained high-intensity gaming could lead to some throttling. The 6nm process node helps mitigate heat, but it's not a guarantee against it. User reviews will be key to determining real-world thermal performance.
❓ How does the 44W charging on the iQOO Z7s compare to other phones in this price range?
44W charging is relatively standard for phones in this price bracket, but it's noticeably slower than the Edge 40 Neo's 68W charging. Expect a full charge to take around 1 hour and 15 minutes, compared to approximately 45-50 minutes for the Edge 40 Neo. This difference is significant for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, it is. The absence of sensor size, aperture, and OIS information makes it difficult to assess camera quality. It suggests that neither phone is positioning itself as a camera-centric device. Expect competent but not exceptional camera performance from both.
