The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the vivo iQOO Z7i and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both promise compelling features, but which one truly delivers?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is the clear winner. Its significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, blazing-fast 67W charging, and brighter display outweigh the iQOO Z7i's more modest specs. While the iQOO Z7i offers decent value, the Poco F5 provides a superior overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 13 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 20 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 (6.56 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | V2230EA | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
vivo iQOO Z7i
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Stylish design
- Slower processor
- Slow charging
- Less vibrant display
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful processor
- Fast charging (67W)
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent battery life
- Slightly higher price
- Potential for software bloat (Xiaomi MIUI)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significant advantage with its 963 nits max brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its contrast ratio is also superior. The iQOO Z7i's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the Poco F5. The Poco F5's display is likely an AMOLED panel, offering richer colors and deeper blacks, while the iQOO Z7i likely uses an LCD panel.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco F5 is expected to have a more advanced camera system. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 often pairs with better image processing capabilities. The iQOO Z7i's camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the Poco F5 should deliver sharper images, better dynamic range, and improved low-light performance. Specific camera specs (megapixels, sensor size) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is a powerhouse, outperforming the iQOO Z7i's Dimensity 6020 by a considerable margin. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Poco F5. The Poco F5's CPU architecture is also more advanced, contributing to its superior speed.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates exceptional battery life with an active use score of 11:52h and an endurance rating of 118h. The iQOO Z7i's battery life is likely good, but not as impressive as the Poco F5. Furthermore, the Poco F5's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 46 minutes, while the iQOO Z7i's 15W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo iQOO Z7i? Those prioritizing a budget-friendly option and are less concerned with raw performance or fast charging. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Users seeking a powerful processor, excellent battery life, a vibrant display, and rapid charging capabilities, even at a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO Z7i good for gaming?
The iQOO Z7i can handle casual games, but demanding titles may experience lag or reduced frame rates due to its less powerful processor.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Poco F5?
The Poco F5 charges to 100% in approximately 46 minutes with its 67W fast charger.