The iQOO Z7i and OnePlus Ace 2V represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Z7i aims for affordability, while the Ace 2V prioritizes performance. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on chipset capabilities, charging speeds, and overall user experience to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9000 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the iQOO Z7i’s Dimensity 6020 and 15W charging. However, budget-conscious buyers will find the iQOO Z7i a capable and affordable option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 13 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 20 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 (6.56 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | V2230EA | PHP110 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 310 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z7i
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset for demanding applications
- Likely lower-quality display
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 9000
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Likely superior display quality
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May run warmer under sustained gaming
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Ace 2V's positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with a faster refresh rate. The Z7i, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz LCD. Bezels are expected to be slimmer on the Ace 2V, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience. Color accuracy will likely be superior on the Ace 2V, benefiting from a more advanced display calibration process.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Ace 2V, being a higher-tier device, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Z7i likely employs a more basic camera setup. Image processing algorithms on the Ace 2V are also expected to be more sophisticated, offering improved dynamic range and color accuracy. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the iQOO Z7i’s Dimensity 6020 (7nm). The Dimensity 9000’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.05 GHz) and A710 performance cores deliver significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks and gaming. The 7nm Dimensity 6020, while capable, is geared towards efficient everyday use. The Ace 2V likely benefits from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing responsiveness. Thermally, the 4nm process of the Dimensity 9000 should result in better efficiency and less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z7i’s 15W wired charging is a significant drawback compared to the OnePlus Ace 2V’s 80W SuperVOOC charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 32 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Ace 2V mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users prioritizing minimal downtime will overwhelmingly favor the Ace 2V. The Z7i’s slower charging will require significantly longer to replenish the battery, impacting convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z7i if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks, prioritize battery longevity over peak performance, and are on a strict budget. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you prefer a smoother, faster experience for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 80W charging. The Ace 2V is for users who want a near-flagship experience without the flagship price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 6020 in the iQOO Z7i sufficient for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 6020 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000 will provide a much smoother experience with higher graphics settings and sustained performance.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2V compared to the 15W charging on the iQOO Z7i in real-world use?
The 80W charging on the Ace 2V can fully charge the phone in approximately 32 minutes. The 15W charging on the Z7i will take well over two hours to achieve a full charge, making the Ace 2V significantly more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Will the OnePlus Ace 2V get noticeably hotter than the iQOO Z7i during extended gaming sessions?
The Ace 2V, with its more powerful chipset, is likely to generate more heat during prolonged gaming. However, the Dimensity 9000’s 4nm process is more efficient, and OnePlus typically implements effective thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating.
