The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and vivo's iQOO Z7 and T2 (India) are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Z7 edges out the vivo T2 thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 920 chipset, offering noticeably better performance for gaming and demanding tasks. While both have similar charging speeds, the iQOO Z7's processing power makes it the winner for users prioritizing speed and responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 17 | 2023, April 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 21 | Available. Released 2023, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 25 min | 44W wired, 50% in 25 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Norway Blue, Pacific Night | Nitro Blaze, Velocity Wave |
| Models | I2207 | V2240, V2222 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 210 EUR |
| SAR | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo iQOO Z7
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 920)
- Fast Charging (44W)
- Likely Good Display (120Hz AMOLED)
- Sleek Design
- Camera may not be as advanced as T2
- Potentially less RAM/Storage options compared to T2
- Availability may vary
vivo T2 (India)
- Potentially Better Camera System
- Reliable Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- Good Battery Life (5000mAh)
- Likely more RAM/Storage options
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Performance may struggle with demanding games
- Charging speed is standard
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.67-inch FHD+ AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. However, the iQOO Z7 might have slightly better brightness and color accuracy based on typical iQOO display tuning. Further research on specific panel models is needed for a definitive answer.
Camera Comparison
The vivo T2 (India) is expected to have a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. While the iQOO Z7 likely has a capable camera, the T2 is anticipated to offer better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Specific sensor details are needed for a precise comparison.
Performance
This is where the iQOO Z7 shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 920 is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect faster app loading times, smoother gaming, and better overall responsiveness on the iQOO Z7. The Snapdragon 695 is still capable, but it won't match the iQOO Z7's performance.
Battery Life
Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery and 44W fast charging, promising all-day battery life and a 50% charge in approximately 25 minutes. Battery life will largely depend on usage patterns, but both should perform similarly in this regard.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo iQOO Z7? Gamers and users who prioritize performance and smooth multitasking will appreciate the iQOO Z7's stronger chipset. Who should buy the vivo T2 (India)? Those seeking a reliable, well-rounded phone with a good camera and decent battery life, and who aren't as concerned with top-tier performance, will find the T2 a solid choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO Z7 good for gaming?
Yes, the iQOO Z7's Dimensity 920 chipset makes it a good choice for gaming, offering smoother performance than the vivo T2.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have a 5000mAh battery and 44W charging, so battery life should be comparable, depending on usage.