The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Z7 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of performance and affordability. While both devices utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, they diverge in charging speeds and battery endurance, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone delivers the most value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and all-day battery life, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger choice. Its 68W charging significantly reduces downtime, and its 10:28h active use score demonstrates superior endurance. However, the iQOO Z7 remains a viable option for those seeking a slightly more affordable device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 17 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 21 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 25 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Norway Blue, Pacific Night | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | I2207 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo iQOO Z7
- Potentially lower price point
- Capable Dimensity 920 chipset
- Decent all-around performance
- Slower 44W charging
- Missing display brightness data
- Limited battery performance information
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 7030 may offer only incremental performance gains
- Camera specs largely unknown
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the iQOO Z7, which lacks published brightness data. While both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels given their market segment, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness translates to a more comfortable viewing experience in direct sunlight. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (like LTPO) are missing for both, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. The iQOO Z7’s camera details are also missing. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
Both the iQOO Z7 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo are powered by octa-core MediaTek Dimensity chips featuring the same CPU core configuration: 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the iQOO Z7 utilizes the Dimensity 920, while the Edge 40 Neo features the Dimensity 7030. While the core architecture is identical, the 7030 is a newer generation chip, potentially offering slight improvements in efficiency and image signal processing. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal for everyday tasks, but the Edge 40 Neo may exhibit a slight edge in sustained workloads. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR5X support would be a significant benefit for either device.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h active use score and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This suggests a well-optimized system and efficient power management. The iQOO Z7’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 44W charging is considerably slower than the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging. The Edge 40 Neo can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the iQOO Z7 takes 25 minutes. This faster charging is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z7 if you need a capable all-rounder at the lowest possible price point and aren't overly concerned with the fastest charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a longer-lasting battery, significantly faster charging, and a brighter, more visible display, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo get noticeably warmer than the Dimensity 920 in the iQOO Z7 during extended gaming sessions?
While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 7030 is a newer generation. This *could* translate to slightly improved thermal efficiency, but without detailed thermal testing data, it's difficult to say definitively. Both phones are likely to experience some throttling under sustained heavy load, but the Edge 40 Neo's newer chip may manage heat slightly better.
❓ How much faster is the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compared to the 44W charging on the iQOO Z7 in real-world usage?
The Edge 40 Neo can reach 50% charge in 15 minutes, while the iQOO Z7 takes 25 minutes for the same. This 10-minute difference is substantial for users who need a quick power boost. A full 0-100% charge on the Edge 40 Neo will likely be completed in under an hour, while the iQOO Z7 will take considerably longer.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo a cause for concern?
It's a valid concern. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, and OIS capabilities, it's hard to assess the camera's performance. However, Motorola generally delivers competitive camera performance in this price range, so it's likely the Edge 40 Neo will offer acceptable image quality, even if it doesn't excel in all conditions.
