vivo iQOO Z7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Z7 takes the lead with its blazing-fast 120W charging and a slightly more powerful chipset. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a brighter display and potentially better battery optimization, resulting in impressive endurance. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities: speed or longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z7 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201.5 g (7.13 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | V2270A | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z7 (China)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Snapdragon 782G)
- Good performance for gaming
- Modern design
- Display brightness not as high as Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Camera potentially not as refined
- Battery life details less clear
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Excellent battery life (97h endurance rating)
- Bright display (890 nits)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Good value for money
- Slower charging (67W)
- Chipset slightly less powerful
- Infinite contrast ratio is nominal
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro shines with its measured 890 nits peak brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z7's display is good, it lacks the same level of brightness. The Redmi Note 12 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both likely use AMOLED panels, providing rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has a more refined camera software and potentially better image processing. While specific megapixel counts aren't provided, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's reputation suggests a focus on image quality and detail. The iQOO Z7's camera is still good, but might not match the Redmi's overall performance.
Performance
The iQOO Z7's Snapdragon 782G chipset generally offers a slight edge in raw performance compared to the Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080. This translates to smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming performance, especially in demanding titles. However, real-world performance differences might be minimal for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro demonstrates exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 97 hours and an active use score of 12 hours and 8 minutes. The iQOO Z7, while not explicitly stated, likely offers good battery life, but the Redmi's endurance is a significant advantage. The iQOO Z7's 120W charging more than compensates for any potential battery life deficit, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z7 is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and a responsive gaming experience. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a better fit for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a well-rounded camera system.