The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra and the vivo iQOO Z7 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both boast blazing-fast 120W charging, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and overall architecture, creating a clear distinction for performance-focused users versus those prioritizing value and efficiency.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking the best overall performance, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset delivers a substantial performance leap over the iQOO Z7’s Snapdragon 782G, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. While both charge quickly, the K60 Ultra’s superior processing power justifies its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2023, August 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2023, August 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201.5 g (7.13 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+, 10-bit |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Black, White, Green |
| Models | V2270A | 23078RKD5C |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z7 (China)
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 782G chipset for everyday tasks
- Significantly less powerful processor than the K60 Ultra
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
- Flagship-level Dimensity 9200+ performance
- Superior thermal efficiency
- Faster charging speed (19 minutes to 100%)
- Likely better camera performance
- Higher price compared to the iQOO Z7
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K60 Ultra's positioning as a more premium device, it likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy. The iQOO Z7, targeting a more budget-conscious segment, may utilize a slightly less advanced display technology. Expect both to offer high refresh rates common in this price bracket, but the K60 Ultra is likely to have a more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Redmi K60 Ultra, being the higher-tier device, likely incorporates a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 782G’s ISP is capable, but the Dimensity 9200+’s ISP is generally considered more advanced, offering better dynamic range and low-light performance. Expect the K60 Ultra to deliver more detailed and vibrant photos, particularly in challenging conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the K60 Ultra would further enhance its camera capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra’s MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) is a flagship-level processor featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz. This architecture provides a significant advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming compared to the iQOO Z7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6nm). The 782G, while capable, utilizes older Cortex-A78 cores and a less efficient manufacturing process. The Dimensity 9200+’s 4nm process also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The K60 Ultra will demonstrably outperform the Z7 in benchmarks and real-world gaming scenarios.
Battery Life
Both devices support 120W wired charging, promising incredibly fast top-ups. The Redmi K60 Ultra claims a full charge in 19 minutes, a testament to its optimized charging circuitry. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the K60 Ultra’s more efficient Dimensity 9200+ chipset will likely result in comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity than the iQOO Z7. The combination of fast charging and efficient power management gives the K60 Ultra an edge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z7 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with incredibly fast charging and are on a tighter budget, prioritizing efficiency over raw power. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and future-proofing your experience with a significantly more powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi K60 Ultra’s Dimensity 9200+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9200+ is built on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency than the 6nm Snapdragon 782G in the iQOO Z7. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the K60 Ultra is designed with advanced cooling solutions to mitigate throttling and maintain consistent performance for extended periods.
❓ Is the 120W charging on both phones equally effective in practice?
While both support 120W charging, the Redmi K60 Ultra claims a full charge in just 19 minutes. This suggests optimized charging circuitry and software integration. The iQOO Z7 may take slightly longer to reach 100%, even with the same wattage, due to differences in battery management and thermal control.
❓ How much of a performance difference will I notice between the Snapdragon 782G and the Dimensity 9200+ in everyday use?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. However, when launching demanding apps, multitasking, or playing graphically intensive games, the Dimensity 9200+ will provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience. The K60 Ultra is built for power users.
