The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Z7 and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Z7 takes the lead with its blazing-fast 120W charging and slightly more powerful Snapdragon 782G. However, the Poco X5 Pro boasts a brighter display and excellent battery life. Ultimately, the iQOO Z7 is for charging speed enthusiasts, while the Poco X5 Pro is ideal for those prioritizing longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201.5 g (7.13 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2270A | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z7 (China)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Snapdragon 782G)
- Good value for money
- Less bright display than Poco X5 Pro
- Camera slightly behind Poco X5 Pro
- Availability may be limited outside China
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Excellent battery life (113h endurance rating)
- Brighter display (912 nits)
- Good camera performance
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed (67W)
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 778G 5G)
- Contrast ratio claim is nominal
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro shines with its measured 912 nits peak brightness, offering a significantly more vibrant and visible display, especially outdoors. While the iQOO Z7's display is good, it lacks the same level of brightness. The Poco X5 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a marketing term.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Poco X5 Pro is generally considered to have a slightly better camera setup, particularly in terms of image processing and low-light performance. The iQOO Z7's camera is still good, but the Poco X5 Pro's software optimization gives it a slight advantage. Specific camera specs are missing, so a direct comparison is difficult.
Performance
The iQOO Z7 holds a slight edge in performance thanks to the Snapdragon 782G, which generally outperforms the Poco X5 Pro's Snapdragon 778G 5G in benchmarks and real-world usage. This translates to smoother multitasking and slightly better gaming performance. Both phones handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 Pro excels in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 113 hours. While the iQOO Z7's battery capacity is likely similar, the Poco X5 Pro's optimization and efficient chipset contribute to its superior longevity. The iQOO Z7's 120W charging more than compensates for any battery life deficit, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z7 is perfect for users who prioritize fast charging and a bit more processing power for gaming or demanding apps. The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a well-rounded camera system, especially if they don't need the absolute fastest charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The iQOO Z7 has a slight edge due to its slightly more powerful Snapdragon 782G chipset, offering potentially smoother gameplay in demanding titles.
❓ Is the Poco X5 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio a real feature?
The 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term. While the Poco X5 Pro likely has a very good contrast ratio, the term itself is not a standard measurement.
