vivo iQOO Z7 vs Xiaomi 12 Lite: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Z7 takes the lead with its significantly faster 120W charging and slightly more powerful Snapdragon 782G chipset. However, the Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a brighter display and potentially better camera optimization. Ultimately, the iQOO Z7 offers superior charging speed and performance for the price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z7 (China) | Xiaomi 12 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 20 | 2022, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, July 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201.5 g (7.13 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink |
| Models | V2270A | 2203129G |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z7 (China)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 782G
- Good value for money
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Display brightness not as high as Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Camera optimization potentially less refined
Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Brighter display (824 nits)
- Potentially better camera optimization
- Sleek and stylish design
- Excellent battery life (100h endurance)
- Slower 67W charging
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Price may be higher than iQOO Z7
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12 Lite shines with its measured 824 nits peak brightness, offering a noticeably more vibrant and visible display, especially outdoors. While the iQOO Z7's display is good, it lacks the same level of brightness. The Xiaomi 12 Lite's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but generally indicates good contrast performance. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels, providing excellent color accuracy and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is often subjective and depends on software optimization. The Xiaomi 12 Lite is expected to have slightly better image processing due to Xiaomi's reputation for camera tuning. Both phones likely feature a main sensor around 50MP, but the iQOO Z7 might offer more versatility with additional lenses. Real-world testing would be needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
The iQOO Z7 holds a clear advantage here. Its Snapdragon 782G chipset is generally considered slightly faster than the Xiaomi 12 Lite's Snapdragon 778G 5G. This translates to smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and potentially better gaming performance. Both chipsets are capable, but the Z7 has a slight edge.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 12 Lite advertises an impressive 100-hour endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the iQOO Z7's 120W charging is a game-changer. It can fully charge the phone in under 20 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. While the Xiaomi 12 Lite's 67W charging is still fast, it can't compete with the iQOO Z7's speed.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z7 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and smooth performance for gaming and demanding apps. The Xiaomi 12 Lite is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, a sleek design, and a potentially more refined camera experience, especially for casual photography.