Both the vivo iQOO Z6 and the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market, relying on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset. However, they diverge significantly in charging speed and overall feature set, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and convenience, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its 67W charging capability dramatically reduces downtime, and the reported 119-hour endurance rating suggests efficient power management. While the iQOO Z6 offers a comparable processor, it can't match the Poco's charging prowess.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 16 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 22 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamo Black, Chromatic Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | I2127 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z6
- Comparable processor to Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Clean and simple user experience (typical of vivo)
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Limited battery endurance advantage over Poco
- Missing detailed camera specifications
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Excellent 119-hour endurance rating
- Likely more feature-rich software experience
- Processor performance identical to iQOO Z6
- Potentially higher price point
- Software bloatware (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both utilize 60Hz panels. The absence of LTPO technology implies neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving. The Poco X4 Pro's larger size (likely) may translate to a more immersive viewing experience, but without concrete data, this remains speculative.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. The absence of these details makes a direct comparison impossible. It's reasonable to assume both employ a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and fixed focus.
Performance
Both the iQOO Z6 and the Poco X4 Pro 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The real-world difference will likely come down to thermal management and RAM configuration (not specified in the data). The 6nm process node offers reasonable efficiency, but sustained workloads could lead to throttling. The GPU performance will also be the same, limiting demanding gaming experiences to medium settings.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3 standards, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. In contrast, the iQOO Z6 is limited to 18W wired charging, resulting in a considerably slower charging experience. Both devices share an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar battery capacity and power efficiency despite the charging disparity. The faster charging of the Poco X4 Pro effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity differences, providing more uptime in real-world scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z6 if you need a straightforward, no-frills 5G experience and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It's a solid option for users who don't heavily rely on their phones throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize fast charging, extended battery life, and a more feature-rich experience. This phone is ideal for power users, gamers, and those who frequently travel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 5G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 5G is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it will likely struggle with graphically intensive titles like PUBG or Genshin Impact at high settings. Expect to play these games at medium settings with moderate frame rates for a smoother experience. Thermal throttling could also become a factor during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the iQOO Z6 in a typical use case?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is dramatically faster. While the iQOO Z6 will take well over an hour to fully charge, the Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 100% in approximately 41 minutes. This means you can quickly top up your battery during short breaks, making it ideal for users on the go. The difference is particularly noticeable when starting from a low battery percentage.
❓ Is the 119-hour endurance rating on both phones realistic for average usage?
The 119-hour endurance rating is based on a standardized testing methodology and may not reflect real-world usage. Factors like screen brightness, app usage, and network connectivity significantly impact battery life. However, it suggests that both phones offer reasonably efficient power management and should comfortably last a full day with moderate use.
