The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Z6 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer impressive specs and features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 Pro edges out the iQOO Z6 Pro thanks to its slightly faster charging, brighter display, and potentially better camera software optimization. However, the iQOO Z6 Pro might offer a more competitive price in some markets, making it a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 27 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 03 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 18 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Phantom Dusk, Legion Sky | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z6 Pro
- Potentially more affordable
- Smooth 120Hz AMOLED display
- Balanced feature set
- Slightly slower charging
- Lower peak brightness display
- Camera software potentially less refined
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Brighter display (912 nits)
- Faster 67W charging
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially better camera software
- May be slightly more expensive
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and visuals. However, the Poco X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 912 nits, significantly brighter than the iQOO Z6 Pro, making it easier to view in direct sunlight. The Poco X5 Pro also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro is expected to have slightly better camera software processing, potentially resulting in more pleasing images in various lighting conditions. While detailed camera specifications are not fully available for both devices, the Poco X5 Pro's reputation for camera optimization gives it a slight edge. Both phones likely feature a main 64MP sensor.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset, offering similar performance in everyday tasks and gaming. While the CPU architecture is identical, slight variations in software optimization could lead to minor performance differences. Real-world usage will likely feel very similar for most users.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The iQOO Z6 Pro's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the Poco X5 Pro's charging speed (67W vs 66W) allows for quicker top-ups. The Poco X5 Pro also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z6 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a smooth gaming experience and a balanced feature set at a potentially lower price. The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, faster charging, and potentially a more refined camera experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Both phones offer excellent gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 778G chipset. The iQOO Z6 Pro might have a slight edge due to potential software optimizations, but the difference will likely be minimal.
❓ Is the Poco X5 Pro worth the extra money?
If you prioritize a brighter display, faster charging, and potentially better camera performance, then the Poco X5 Pro is likely worth the extra investment. However, if budget is a major concern, the iQOO Z6 Pro remains a solid option.
