The vivo iQOO Z6 44W and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge in key areas – the iQOO Z6 prioritizes a streamlined experience with a focus on efficient 4G connectivity, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G pushes for 5G capabilities and faster charging, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers 5G connectivity and a slight performance edge, complemented by 67W charging that significantly reduces downtime. However, users on tighter budgets or with limited 5G access may find the iQOO Z6 a more sensible option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 27 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 02 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 27 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lumina Blue, Raven Black | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z6 44W
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for everyday tasks
- Competitive pricing for budget-conscious buyers
- Reliable battery endurance (115h)
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Camera performance likely lags behind the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially higher price point
- Battery life comparable to iQOO Z6 despite faster charging
- May experience slight thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Z6 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels given their price points, the Redmi’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also features an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of IPS displays, but the lack of specific display technology details for the iQOO Z6 makes a direct comparison of color accuracy and viewing angles difficult. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective price brackets.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison challenging. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s likely larger sensor (based on market trends for Pro models) and potentially wider aperture lens would offer better low-light performance and dynamic range. The iQOO Z6’s camera system is likely geared towards providing adequate results in good lighting conditions, but may struggle in challenging scenarios. Ignoring the ubiquitous 2MP macro sensors on both devices, the primary camera performance will be the deciding factor for most users.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Z6 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm), while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 695, with its Kryo 660 Gold cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, offers a performance advantage over the 680’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores, particularly in multi-threaded tasks. Crucially, the 695 integrates a 5G modem, providing future-proofing and faster data speeds where available. Both phones utilize an octa-core configuration, but the architectural improvements in the 695 translate to a smoother experience for demanding applications. The iQOO Z6’s 4G limitation is a significant consideration for users in areas with expanding 5G networks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the iQOO Z6’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The iQOO Z6’s 44W charging takes 27 minutes to reach 50%, indicating a slower overall charging experience. This difference in charging speed is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z6 44W if you need a reliable, efficient smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize value over 5G connectivity. It’s ideal for users in areas with limited 5G infrastructure or those who don’t heavily rely on data-intensive applications. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prefer faster charging speeds, 5G connectivity for future-proofing, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G offer a noticeable gaming improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the iQOO Z6?
While neither chipset is designed for hardcore gaming, the Snapdragon 695 provides a modest performance boost, allowing for smoother gameplay in less demanding titles. Expect to play games like PUBG Mobile at medium settings with acceptable frame rates on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, whereas the iQOO Z6 might require lower settings to maintain similar performance.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G compared to the 44W charging on the iQOO Z6 in real-world usage?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging is significantly faster. Reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes versus 27 minutes on the iQOO Z6 translates to a substantial time saving, especially for users who need a quick power boost before heading out. A full charge takes 42 minutes on the Redmi versus an unspecified, but likely longer, time on the iQOO Z6.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G worth the extra cost if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
If 5G coverage is currently limited, the benefit of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 5G connectivity is diminished. However, investing in a 5G-capable device future-proofs your purchase as 5G networks continue to expand. Consider your long-term usage and potential for 5G access when making your decision.
