The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and vivo iQOO Z6 44W represent compelling options. The Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and faster charging, while the iQOO Z6 focuses on a streamlined experience with a capable 4G chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers future-proofing with 5G support and a performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 67W charging. While the iQOO Z6 is a solid 4G device, the Poco’s added features justify the slight price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 27 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 27 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lumina Blue, Raven Black | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z6 44W
- Clean and streamlined software experience (typical of vivo)
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for everyday tasks
- Competitive 44W fast charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Potentially less powerful chipset for demanding games
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be resource-intensive
- Potentially larger footprint due to larger display
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both displays are adequate for everyday use, but neither is likely to excel in direct sunlight. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s larger size (implied by its overall dimensions) may offer a slightly more immersive viewing experience, but without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to quantify.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market trend suggests the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor. The iQOO Z6’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the Poco X4 Pro 5G is expected to deliver better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact the overall camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Z6 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm), while the Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 695, with its Kryo 660 Gold cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the 680’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores, particularly in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The 695 also unlocks 5G connectivity, a significant benefit for users in areas with 5G coverage. While both are 6nm chips, the architectural improvements in the 695 translate to better efficiency and sustained performance. The iQOO Z6 is sufficient for basic usage, but the Poco X4 Pro 5G is better equipped for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones have an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the iQOO Z6’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The iQOO Z6 supports 44W wired charging, reaching 50% in 27 minutes. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, with its 67W wired charging (supporting PD3.0 and QC3), is significantly faster, achieving 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This faster charging is a major advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z6 44W if you primarily need a reliable 4G smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize a clean software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want 5G connectivity for future network upgrades, faster charging speeds, and a more versatile chipset capable of handling demanding applications and games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G handle graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 680 in the iQOO Z6, especially with optimized game settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 44W charging on the iQOO Z6 in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is noticeably faster. While the iQOO Z6 reaches 50% in 27 minutes, the Poco X4 Pro 5G achieves 70% in the same timeframe. A full charge on the Poco takes 41 minutes, compared to an estimated longer duration for the iQOO Z6. This translates to less time tethered to a charger and more time using your phone.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G actually useful, or is it just a marketing gimmick?
The usefulness of 5G depends on your location and carrier. If you live in an area with 5G coverage and have a 5G data plan, the Poco X4 Pro 5G will offer significantly faster download and upload speeds compared to 4G. Even if 5G isn't readily available now, having a 5G-enabled phone future-proofs your investment as 5G networks continue to expand.
