The iQOO Z6 44W and Honor X8c represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both devices leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6-series, but subtle differences in chipset and charging capabilities could make one a better fit for your needs. This comparison dissects those nuances to determine which phone delivers the most value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor X8c edges out the iQOO Z6 44W. While both share the same 6nm Snapdragon 6-series process, the X8c’s Snapdragon 685 boasts higher clock speeds on its primary cores, translating to a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks. The slightly slower 35W charging is a reasonable trade-off.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 27 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 02 | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 27 min | 35W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lumina Blue, Raven Black | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | - | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
vivo iQOO Z6 44W
- Faster 44W charging
- Potentially more readily available in certain markets
- Competitive pricing
- Slower CPU performance compared to the X8c
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
Honor X8c
- More powerful Snapdragon 685 processor
- Improved multitasking capabilities
- Slightly better overall performance
- Slower 35W charging
- May be less widely available
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this segment. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on usability. Without specific display specs, we can assume similar brightness levels. The key difference will likely be color calibration and viewing angles, areas where Honor often demonstrates a slight edge in tuning. Bezels are expected to be comparable, prioritizing affordability over an immersive edge-to-edge experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, relying heavily on software processing. Both phones will likely feature a primary camera around the 50MP mark, but without knowing sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The iQOO Z6 44W and Honor X8c will almost certainly include 2MP macro and depth sensors, which offer limited utility. Image quality will depend more on the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon chipsets and Honor/vivo’s software algorithms than on raw hardware specifications.
Performance
The core of the comparison lies in the chipsets. The Honor X8c’s Snapdragon 685 features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz, a significant step up from the iQOO Z6 44W’s Snapdragon 680 with its 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores. While both are 6nm chips, the architectural difference and higher clock speeds give the 685 a clear advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The GPU performance will be similar, but the 685’s CPU boost will be more noticeable in everyday use and light gaming. Both devices likely pair their chipsets with 4GB or 6GB of RAM, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z6 44W’s 44W charging is its standout feature, promising a 50% charge in just 27 minutes. The Honor X8c’s 35W charging is slower, but still respectable. Battery capacity is not specified, but both are likely in the 5000mAh range. The faster charging of the iQOO Z6 44W is beneficial for users who frequently need a quick power boost, while the Honor X8c’s slightly more efficient processor might translate to marginally better battery life during moderate use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z6 44W if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds within this price bracket and frequently need to top up your phone quickly. Buy the Honor X8c if you value a smoother overall user experience, particularly when multitasking or running slightly more demanding applications, and appreciate a more responsive processor for the price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 685 can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play on medium settings for a smooth experience. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but the higher CPU clock speeds compared to the Snapdragon 680 in the iQOO Z6 44W will result in fewer frame drops and a more consistent experience.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the iQOO Z6 44W compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X8c in real-world use?
The iQOO Z6 44W can reach 50% charge in approximately 27 minutes. The Honor X8c will take closer to 45-60 minutes to achieve the same. This difference is most noticeable when you need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, both the iQOO Z6 44W and Honor X8c are likely to support microSD card expansion, a common feature in this price segment. Check the official product listings for confirmation.
❓ Which phone is better for multitasking and running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Honor X8c is better suited for multitasking due to the Snapdragon 685’s more powerful CPU. The higher clock speeds on the primary cores will allow it to handle multiple apps running in the background more efficiently.
