The iQOO Z5 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a smooth user experience, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and charging capabilities, making the choice less straightforward than it appears. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a generally responsive experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, gamers and power users will appreciate the iQOO Z5’s more potent Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 23 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 28 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS for iQOO 1.0 (China) | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 26 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic Dawn, Mystic Space, Cyber Grid, Aurora | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2148A | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z5
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset for better performance.
- Superior CPU architecture for faster app loading and responsiveness.
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance due to more efficient chipset.
- Slower 44W charging compared to the Redmi.
- Likely less advanced camera system than the Redmi Note 11 Pro+.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support.
- Potentially more advanced camera system with larger sensor and OIS.
- Generally smooth experience for everyday tasks and casual gaming.
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset compared to the iQOO Z5.
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained heavy load.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so we must rely on market positioning. Given the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s ‘Pro’ designation, it likely features a higher resolution and potentially a smoother refresh rate than the iQOO Z5. However, without specific details like peak brightness (nits) and color gamut coverage, a definitive assessment is impossible. Both are likely to utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the Redmi may have a slight edge in visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, analysis is limited. However, Xiaomi typically emphasizes camera capabilities in its ‘Pro’ models. It’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The iQOO Z5 likely focuses on providing a balanced camera experience, but may not match the Redmi’s potential for low-light photography or detailed image capture. The absence of details prevents a thorough comparison of image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z5’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – an octa-core setup with 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The 778G’s inclusion of prime Cortex-A78 cores provides a noticeable advantage in single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. While both are 6nm chips, the 778G’s architecture translates to superior sustained performance, particularly in graphically intensive games. The iQOO Z5 will likely exhibit less throttling under load.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) significantly outperforms the iQOO Z5 in charging speed. Its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, achieves 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The iQOO Z5’s 44W charging takes 26 minutes to reach 50%, indicating a slower overall charging cycle. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery, offering more convenient top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z5 if you need a phone optimized for sustained gaming and demanding applications, benefiting from the Snapdragon 778G’s superior CPU and GPU performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize rapid charging, minimizing downtime, and a generally smooth experience for everyday tasks and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 is capable, Genshin Impact and similar graphically intensive titles will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. The iQOO Z5’s Snapdragon 778G offers a more comfortable gaming experience at higher settings due to its superior GPU performance.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 44W on the iQOO Z5 in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G translates to a significantly faster top-up. Reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes versus 26 minutes on the iQOO Z5 means you can quickly add substantial battery life during short breaks, making it ideal for users on the go.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the iQOO Z5 offer noticeable improvements in app launch speeds compared to the Snapdragon 695?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G’s more powerful CPU architecture, particularly its prime Cortex-A78 cores, results in faster app launch times and a more responsive user interface. This difference will be most noticeable when switching between multiple apps or launching resource-intensive applications.
