The vivo iQOO Z5 and Z6 Pro are both mid-range smartphones offering impressive features at competitive prices. But with subtle differences, choosing between them can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key aspects, helping you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Z6 Pro emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster 66W charging, which dramatically reduces charging times. While both phones share the same capable Snapdragon 778G chipset, the Z6 Pro's charging advantage makes it the better overall value for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 23 | 2022, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 28 | Available. Released 2022, May 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS for iQOO 1.0 (China) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 26 min | 66W wired, 50% in 18 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic Dawn, Mystic Space, Cyber Grid, Aurora | Phantom Dusk, Legion Sky |
| Models | V2148A | - |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 300 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z5
- Balanced performance
- Good value for money
- Decent camera
- Slower charging speed
- May lack some of the latest features
vivo iQOO Z6 Pro
- Significantly faster charging
- Similar performance to Z5
- Potentially improved camera software
- Slightly higher price
- Minor design differences
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a 6.44-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. Expect similar brightness and resolution levels. Differences might lie in the display panel calibration and protective glass (likely Gorilla Glass 3 on both).
Camera Comparison
The iQOO Z5 typically features a 64MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The iQOO Z6 Pro likely retains a similar camera setup, but vivo may have improved image processing algorithms for better low-light performance and color accuracy. Expect comparable video recording capabilities (likely 4K at 30fps).
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset, ensuring smooth performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. The CPU and GPU configurations are identical, so expect similar gaming performance and app loading speeds. Software optimization might slightly influence the user experience.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z5 typically has a 4500mAh battery. The iQOO Z6 Pro also likely has a 4500mAh battery. However, the charging speed is the key differentiator here. The Z5 offers 44W charging, while the Z6 Pro boasts 66W charging, significantly reducing charging times.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Z5 is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a balanced experience and don't need the absolute fastest charging. The iQOO Z6 Pro is ideal for those who value quick charging and are willing to spend a bit more for the convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G chipset good for gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset that can handle most mobile games smoothly at medium to high settings. It offers a good balance of performance and efficiency.
❓ What is the difference in charging time between the two phones?
The iQOO Z6 Pro charges significantly faster with its 66W charging, reaching 50% in approximately 18 minutes, compared to the iQOO Z5's 44W charging, which takes around 26 minutes to reach 50%.
