The iQOO Z10x and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. The A53 5G, while established, faces a challenge from the newer Z10x, which boasts a more recent chipset and faster charging capabilities. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device delivers the best value and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the iQOO Z10x emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7300, fabricated on a 4nm process, provides a performance edge over the 5nm Exynos 1280 in the A53 5G, coupled with significantly faster 44W charging. While the A53 5G offers a proven track record, the Z10x delivers a more modern experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 11 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 22 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, 1050 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ultramarine, Titanium, Ocean Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | I2404 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | ₹ 13,998 | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z10x
- Faster 44W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Camera specifications are currently unknown
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Bright and vibrant Super AMOLED display
- Well-established Samsung software ecosystem
- Proven reliability and brand reputation
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Potentially more thermal throttling under load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G features a display capable of reaching 830 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the Z10x’s display specifications are not provided, Samsung’s Super AMOLED technology typically delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks, with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio. The A53’s brightness advantage is significant, especially for users who frequently consume content in direct sunlight. However, without knowing the Z10x’s panel type and refresh rate, a definitive display winner is difficult to declare.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the iQOO Z10x. The Galaxy A53 5G likely relies on Samsung’s image processing algorithms, known for producing vibrant, sometimes oversaturated, images. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture of the Z10x, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A53 5G is largely a marketing feature, offering limited practical benefit due to its low resolution. A comparison would hinge on the Z10x’s primary sensor size and image processing capabilities.
Performance
The iQOO Z10x’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a clear architectural advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm). The 4nm process node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the Z10x to sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Dimensity 7300’s CPU configuration – 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is also slightly faster than the A53’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, giving the Z10x a noticeable edge.
Battery Life
Both the iQOO Z10x and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, the Z10x’s 44W wired charging is a significant advantage over the A53 5G’s 25W charging. This translates to substantially faster charging times, allowing users to quickly replenish the battery. While the A53 5G’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Z10x mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10x if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value faster charging speeds. You'll benefit from a more efficient chipset and quicker power-ups. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brand with a well-established software ecosystem, and a display known for its brightness, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280, while capable, is known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load, such as extended gaming. This can lead to reduced performance over time. The iQOO Z10x’s Dimensity 7300, built on a more efficient 4nm process, is less prone to overheating and should maintain higher sustained performance.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Galaxy A53 5G actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on smartphones offer limited practical benefit. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. While they can capture close-up shots, the quality is often subpar compared to using the main camera with digital zoom or dedicated macro modes found on higher-end devices.
❓ Can the iQOO Z10x reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high graphics settings?
The Dimensity 7300 chipset in the iQOO Z10x is well-equipped to handle PUBG Mobile at high graphics settings and maintain a stable 60fps. The 4nm process and efficient CPU/GPU architecture contribute to sustained performance, minimizing frame drops during intense gameplay. However, actual performance will depend on the specific game optimization and background processes.
