The iQOO Z10x and OnePlus Nord 2T represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage Mediatek Dimensity chipsets, they diverge significantly in charging speed, processing architecture, and overall feature set. This comparison dissects these differences to help you determine which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 1300, coupled with 80W SuperVOOC charging, offers a smoother experience and quicker top-ups, despite the iQOO Z10x's newer 4nm process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 11 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 22 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, 1050 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ultramarine, Titanium, Ocean Blue | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | I2404 | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | ₹ 13,998 | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9)
GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z10x
- Newer 4nm Dimensity 7300 chipset for potential efficiency gains.
- Reverse wired charging offers added convenience.
- Potentially better long-term thermal management due to the 4nm process.
- Slower 44W charging compared to the Nord 2T.
- Less aggressive CPU core configuration may result in lower peak performance.
- Limited display information available.
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Faster 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD support.
- More powerful CPU configuration with a higher clock speed.
- Brighter display (636 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- Older 6nm Dimensity 1300 chipset.
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Reliance on proprietary SuperVOOC charging standard.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, providing a visibly brighter experience in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Z10x (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio claim of the Nord 2T, the Nord 2T’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor visibility. The absence of refresh rate information for the iQOO Z10x suggests it may not match the smoothness offered by the Nord 2T, which is expected to have a 90Hz or 120Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of OnePlus typically prioritizes image processing and consistent results, while iQOO often focuses on hardware specifications. The absence of details suggests neither phone will challenge flagship camera performance, but the Nord 2T’s established image processing pipeline likely provides a more polished experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z10x’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm) utilizes a more efficient manufacturing process, potentially leading to better thermal efficiency. However, the OnePlus Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300 (6nm) features a more aggressive CPU configuration – a single 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside three 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the Z10x’s four 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to higher peak CPU performance on the Nord 2T, beneficial for demanding tasks and gaming. The Z10x’s efficiency gains may be more noticeable during prolonged, less intensive workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (data unavailable for iQOO Z10x). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD support significantly outperforms the iQOO Z10x’s 44W wired charging. This means the Nord 2T can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime – a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10x if you prioritize a newer chipset fabrication process (4nm) and potentially better long-term thermal management, even if it means sacrificing peak performance and charging speed. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you value faster charging, a proven chipset with a higher clock speed, and a more refined software experience, making it ideal for power users and gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7300 in the iQOO Z10x handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
While the Dimensity 7300 is a capable chipset, Genshin Impact at high settings may require compromises in frame rate or graphics quality. The Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300, with its more powerful CPU, is likely to provide a smoother experience, though both phones will likely benefit from adjusting graphics settings for optimal performance.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the OnePlus Nord 2T with the 80W SuperVOOC charger?
OnePlus claims the Nord 2T can charge from 1% to 100% in approximately 27 minutes with the 80W SuperVOOC charger. Real-world results may vary slightly depending on usage and ambient temperature, but it remains significantly faster than the iQOO Z10x’s 44W charging.
❓ Does the iQOO Z10x's 4nm process translate to a noticeable difference in battery life during everyday use?
The 4nm process *should* contribute to improved power efficiency, potentially extending battery life during less demanding tasks like browsing or streaming. However, the difference is likely to be subtle and may not be noticeable in typical daily usage, especially given both phones have a 100-hour endurance rating.
