The iQOO Z10x and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Z10x aggressively targets performance with a newer Mediatek Dimensity chipset, while the Edge 30 Neo emphasizes a balanced experience with a focus on design and efficient charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and demanding tasks, the iQOO Z10x is the clear winner thanks to its Dimensity 7300. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo offers a more refined, efficient experience with faster charging and a brighter display, making it ideal for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 11 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 22 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, 1050 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ultramarine, Titanium, Ocean Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | I2404 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | ₹ 13,998 | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z10x
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 7300
- More efficient 4nm chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Display specs are unknown
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Brighter display (1004 nits)
- Faster charging (68W wired, 5W wireless)
- Compact and lightweight design
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- 6nm process less efficient than 4nm
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the iQOO Z10x. This makes the Neo more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Edge 30 Neo’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘infinite’ (a typical marketing claim), the Z10x’s panel characteristics are unknown. The Neo’s smaller 6.27-inch screen size versus the Z10x’s likely larger panel (based on typical iQOO designs) may also appeal to users preferring a more compact device. The lack of detailed display specs for the Z10x hinders a complete assessment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of information regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests both rely on software stabilization. The Edge 30 Neo’s marketing often highlights its camera, but without concrete specs, it’s hard to assess its advantage. We can assume the Z10x, given iQOO’s focus on performance, may prioritize video recording capabilities.
Performance
The iQOO Z10x’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300, fabricated on a 4nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance and efficiency over the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration, featuring four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, will deliver significantly faster CPU performance in benchmarks and real-world applications. While the Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Z10x will excel in gaming and demanding applications. The 4nm node also implies better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Z10x is likely to have faster RAM (LPDDR5x) than the Edge 30 Neo, further boosting performance.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Z10x). However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s charging capabilities are a clear advantage. Its 68W wired charging will significantly reduce charging times compared to the iQOO Z10x’s 44W charging. The addition of 5W wireless charging on the Neo provides added convenience, a feature absent on the Z10x. While the Z10x offers reverse wired charging, the Neo’s faster wired charging speeds are more impactful for daily use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10x if you need a phone for demanding mobile gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and are willing to trade some battery efficiency for superior performance. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a sleek, lightweight design, prioritize fast charging and a vibrant display, and primarily use your phone for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and photography.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Edge 30 Neo struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The iQOO Z10x’s Dimensity 7300 will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher frame rates and graphical fidelity.
❓ How long will it realistically take to fully charge the iQOO Z10x with its 44W charging?
Based on typical 44W charging speeds, a full charge from 0% to 100% on the iQOO Z10x will likely take around 60-75 minutes. This is considerably slower than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W charging.
❓ Does the Motorola Edge 30 Neo support 5G carrier aggregation for faster download speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 supports 5G carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for potentially faster download speeds, provided your carrier supports it. The iQOO Z10x's Dimensity 7300 also supports 5G carrier aggregation.
❓ Is the lack of detailed display information for the iQOO Z10x a major concern?
Yes, the absence of specs like peak brightness, color accuracy, and panel type makes it difficult to assess the Z10x’s display quality. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s brighter display is a known advantage, and the Z10x may fall behind in outdoor visibility.
