The iQOO Z10x and Honor X9 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. The Z10x prioritizes raw processing power with the newer Mediatek Dimensity 7300, while the X9 5G focuses on a balance of efficiency and fast charging with the Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking, the iQOO Z10x emerges as the stronger choice thanks to the superior processing capabilities of the Dimensity 7300. However, the Honor X9 5G’s faster 66W charging and potentially better power efficiency make it a compelling option for everyday users who value battery life and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 11 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 22 | Available. Released 2022, March 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, 1050 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 66W wired, 81% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ultramarine, Titanium, Ocean Blue | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | I2404 | ANY-NX1 |
| Price | ₹ 13,998 | About 240 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z10x
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 7300
- More efficient 4nm chipset for better thermal management
- Potential for smoother gaming experience
- Slower 44W charging compared to the competition
- Potentially higher power consumption during intensive tasks
Honor X9 5G
- Faster 66W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially better battery life due to Snapdragon 695 efficiency
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 7300
- May struggle with demanding games or applications
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, both likely feature LCD panels. The iQOO brand often focuses on higher refresh rates, potentially giving it an edge in smoothness. The Honor X9 5G's display quality will likely be adequate for everyday use, but may not match the color accuracy or peak brightness of higher-end panels.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the focus should be on the main sensor. Assuming both phones feature a standard multi-camera setup, the iQOO Z10x’s potential for a larger sensor (given its focus on performance) could result in better low-light performance and dynamic range. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, and brand-specific tuning will likely differentiate the final image quality. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant differentiator, but is unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z10x’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Honor X9 5G’s 6nm Snapdragon 695. The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration, featuring four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, will deliver substantially faster CPU performance, particularly in multi-threaded workloads. The Snapdragon 695, with its Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores, is geared towards efficiency, potentially offering longer battery life during less demanding tasks. The 4nm node of the Dimensity 7300 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained gaming sessions. This makes the iQOO Z10x the clear winner for power users.
Battery Life
The Honor X9 5G boasts a clear advantage in charging speed with its 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 81% charge in just 30 minutes. The iQOO Z10x’s 44W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 695’s inherent efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size, providing comparable or even better real-world battery life. The X9 5G’s faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their phone quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10x if you frequently engage in mobile gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications and need the fastest possible processing speeds. Buy the Honor X9 5G if you prioritize all-day battery life, quick top-ups with its 66W charging, and a more balanced overall experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and streaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor X9 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, but it's not designed for the highest graphics settings in demanding games like Genshin Impact. You'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. The iQOO Z10x with the Dimensity 7300 will provide a significantly smoother gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the Honor X9 5G compared to the 44W charging on the iQOO Z10x in real-world use?
The Honor X9 5G’s 66W charging can deliver a substantial time saving. While the exact 0-100% time for the iQOO Z10x isn’t specified, it will likely take considerably longer than the X9 5G’s reported 81% in 30 minutes. This means you can get a significant charge boost in a shorter amount of time with the Honor X9 5G, ideal for users on the go.
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300 in the iQOO Z10x generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7300’s 4nm process is designed to improve thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, it should be well-managed, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance. However, sustained, high-intensity gaming will still result in some warming of the device.
