Motorola Edge 50 Pro vs vivo iQOO Z10R: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is the superior choice. Its 125W charging and 1295 nit peak brightness offer tangible benefits. However, the iQOO Z10R remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users who value a balanced performance profile.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z10R (India) | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 24 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 29 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.7 x 7.4 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.29 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired Reverse wired | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5700 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aquamarine, Moonstone | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | - | XT2403-2 |
| Price | ₹ 19,498 | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z10R (India)
- Faster 44W wired charging with reverse wired charging.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Solid performance for everyday tasks.
- Likely lower display brightness.
- Less advanced chipset architecture compared to Snapdragon 7 Gen 3.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W wired charging (18 minutes to full).
- Significantly brighter 1295 nit display.
- 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging.
- More modern Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset.
- Potentially higher price.
- May not offer the same value proposition as the iQOO Z10R for budget-conscious users.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1295 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Z10R (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower given the price difference). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s brightness impacts the overall user experience, especially for media consumption. The Edge 50 Pro’s panel likely benefits from a higher contrast ratio due to its brightness capabilities, enhancing visual clarity. We expect the Edge 50 Pro to have a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the iQOO Z10R, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price point, it’s reasonable to assume the Edge 50 Pro will offer a more sophisticated camera system. The Edge 50 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities. The focus should be on the primary sensor and its aperture, as these are key determinants of low-light performance. The iQOO Z10R may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor.
Performance
Both devices employ 4nm chipsets, but the architectures differ significantly. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, featuring a 1x Cortex-A715 prime core and 4x Cortex-A715 performance cores alongside 3x Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. The iQOO Z10R, on the other hand, uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, with a 4x Cortex-A78 and 4x Cortex-A55 configuration. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s newer core design and potentially more efficient GPU should translate to better sustained performance in demanding tasks and games. While both have octa-core CPUs clocked around 2.6 GHz, the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 are likely to provide a smoother experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s 125W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 18 minutes. This is a substantial advantage over the iQOO Z10R’s 44W charging. The Edge 50 Pro also includes 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. While the Edge 50 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 11:59h suggests excellent battery life. The iQOO Z10R’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed indicates a trade-off in convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10R (India) if you need a reliable performer for everyday tasks and gaming, and prioritize value for money within the Indian market. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prefer blazing-fast 125W charging, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the convenience of wireless charging.