iQOO Z10 Turbo+ vs Redmi K70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the winner. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, despite being on a 4nm process, offers a more mature and optimized experience, coupled with the significantly faster 120W charging. However, the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ presents a compelling alternative for those seeking the absolute latest in MediaTek silicon.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 07 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 07 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4320Hz PWM, 2000 nits (HBM), 5500 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PD/PPS Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Gray, Gold | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | V2507A | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Latest MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ processor
- Potentially superior power efficiency (3nm process)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Software optimization may be less mature
- Slower charging speed (90W vs 120W)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor
- Faster 120W wired charging
- Likely more refined software experience
- 4nm process may be less power efficient than 3nm
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, typical of their market segment. The Redmi K70 Pro, given Xiaomi’s history, may incorporate LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, potentially improving battery life. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+ may prioritize peak brightness for outdoor visibility. Without specific data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Xiaomi often excels in display calibration and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, analysis is limited. However, both brands typically prioritize main sensor quality. The Redmi K70 Pro, benefiting from Xiaomi’s image processing expertise, likely delivers more consistent and refined image quality. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+ may focus on delivering vibrant, social media-ready photos. The absence of details regarding OIS and lens apertures makes a definitive comparison impossible, but a larger main sensor generally translates to better low-light performance.
Performance
The core battle lies between the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The Dimensity 9400+ utilizes a 3nm process, theoretically offering greater power efficiency and transistor density compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm node. However, Qualcomm’s architectural optimizations and software integration often translate to superior real-world performance and thermal management. The Dimensity 9400+'s Cortex-X925 core at 3.73 GHz is a significant advantage on paper, but sustained performance will depend on how well iQOO manages heat. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s more balanced core configuration (1x X4, 3x A720, 2x A720, 2x A520) suggests better sustained performance under load. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration will impact overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising a full charge in just 18 minutes. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s 90W charging is still fast, but noticeably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi K70 Pro effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. Both phones support PD3.0/PPS and QC3+, offering versatile charging options. The iQOO also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ if you need the absolute newest processor technology and are comfortable with potentially early software optimization quirks. It’s ideal for power users who want to experiment with the latest features and benchmark scores. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prefer a more refined and consistently performant experience, faster charging speeds, and a proven track record of software stability. It’s the better choice for gamers and everyday users who demand reliability.