iQOO Z10 Turbo+ vs iQOO 12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the iQOO 12 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with 120W charging and wireless charging capabilities, provides a more refined and versatile experience. However, the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers prioritizing raw CPU performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | vivo iQOO 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 07 | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 07 | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4320Hz PWM, 2000 nits (HBM), 5500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PD/PPS Reverse wired | 120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Gray, Gold | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | V2507A | V2329A |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 650 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance due to Dimensity 9400+’s Cortex-X925 core.
- Competitive price point offering flagship-level processing power.
- 90W fast wired charging provides quick top-ups.
- Likely inferior thermal management compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.
- Lacks wireless charging.
- Potentially less refined camera system.
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers excellent all-around performance and efficiency.
- 120W wired and 50W wireless charging provide unparalleled charging speed and convenience.
- Likely superior camera system with larger sensor and OIS.
- Higher price point.
- May not match the Z10 Turbo+ in peak single-core CPU performance.
- Potential for software bloat (typical of vivo/iQOO).
Display Comparison
While specific display specs are missing, both iQOO phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels. The iQOO 12 Pro, positioned as a flagship, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving power efficiency. The Z10 Turbo+ may prioritize refresh rate over peak brightness to maintain a competitive price. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the 12 Pro’s build quality will likely be superior.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the iQOO 12 Pro, as a flagship, is expected to feature a larger main sensor with OIS, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Z10 Turbo+ will likely prioritize value, potentially sacrificing sensor size and OIS for a lower price. Image processing algorithms will also differ, with the 12 Pro likely offering more refined and natural-looking results.
Performance
The core battle lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) features a unique CPU configuration with a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, suggesting a focus on single-core performance. The iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a more conventional Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz. While the Dimensity boasts higher clock speeds, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process and architectural optimizations likely provide better sustained performance and thermal management. The Z10 Turbo+’s LPDDR5x RAM is standard, but the 12 Pro may utilize faster RAM variants. The Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU will likely outperform the Dimensity’s GPU in graphically intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The iQOO 12 Pro’s 120W wired charging is significantly faster than the Z10 Turbo+’s 90W charging, translating to quicker top-ups. The addition of 50W wireless charging on the 12 Pro is a major advantage, offering convenience that the Z10 Turbo+ lacks. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the 12 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Z10 Turbo+’s 55W PD/PPS charging is still respectable, but slower than the 120W standard.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ if you prioritize peak CPU performance for demanding tasks and gaming, and are comfortable with a slightly less polished overall experience. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you value a more complete package with faster charging, wireless charging, and a potentially more stable software experience, even if it comes at a higher price point.