iQOO Z10 Turbo+ vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw gaming performance and slightly faster charging, the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, offers a slight edge in sustained performance and efficiency. However, the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ presents a strong value proposition with its Dimensity 9400+ and competitive charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | OnePlus Ace 3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 07 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 07 | Available. Released 2024, July 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.7 / 8.9 / 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 207 g, 212 g, 225 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4320Hz PWM, 2000 nits (HBM), 5500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PD/PPS Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD2.0, QC2, 52% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | 6100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Gray, Gold | Gray, White, Green |
| Models | V2507A | PJX110 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 410 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Potentially higher single-core CPU performance due to Cortex-X925
- 3nm process may offer better thermal management
- Reverse wired charging for accessory power
- Slower wired charging speed (90W vs 100W)
- MediaTek chipset may have less optimized software support
OnePlus Ace 3 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers superior GPU performance
- Faster 100W wired charging with quick boost capabilities
- Potentially more refined software experience
- 4nm process may run slightly warmer under sustained load
- Lacks reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, typical of their market segment. The key difference will likely lie in peak brightness and color calibration. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro, given its flagship aspirations, may boast a slightly higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. However, without specific data, it's difficult to definitively state which offers a superior visual experience. Expect both to support HDR10+.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, analysis is limited. However, given the price points, both phones likely feature a primary camera in the 50MP-100MP range. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro, aligning with OnePlus’s history, may prioritize image processing for natural-looking photos, while iQOO often leans towards more vibrant, saturated colors. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor will be crucial for low-light performance, and a detail to look for in reviews. The absence of information on secondary sensors makes it difficult to assess the overall camera system's capabilities.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) features a unique CPU configuration with a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, suggesting a focus on single-core performance. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz. While the Dimensity boasts a higher clock speed on its prime core, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process offers improved power efficiency and sustained performance. The Dimensity’s architecture, with three Cortex-X4 cores, could provide strong multi-core performance, but the Snapdragon’s optimized architecture and Adreno GPU will likely deliver a smoother gaming experience. Both devices utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration will impact real-world performance.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s 100W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising a full charge in 36 minutes, and a 52% charge in just 15 minutes. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s 90W charging is still very fast, but lags behind. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s efficiency may offset the slightly slower charging speed, providing comparable real-world battery life. The iQOO also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the provided OnePlus specs, adding convenience for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ if you need maximum CPU performance for multitasking and demanding applications, and appreciate the potential for slightly better thermal headroom due to the 3nm process. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro if you prefer a more refined software experience, slightly superior GPU performance for gaming, and the convenience of faster overall charging times, even if it comes at a small price premium.