iQOO Z10 Turbo+ vs OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400+ chipset, built on a 3nm process, offers a performance edge. However, the OnePlus 12R provides excellent value with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and superior battery endurance, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 07 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 07 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4320Hz PWM, 2000 nits (HBM), 5500 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PD/PPS Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Gray, Gold | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | V2507A | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9400+ chipset for superior performance
- 3nm fabrication process for improved efficiency
- 90W wired charging with reverse wired charging capability
- Battery life potentially lower than OnePlus 12R
- Camera specifications currently unknown
OnePlus 12R
- Excellent battery life (14:32h active use)
- Fast 100W charging (100% in 26 minutes)
- High peak display brightness (1181 nits)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a generation behind the Dimensity 9400+
- May exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R features a display capable of reaching 1181 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to expect a high-quality panel given iQOO’s focus on gaming. The OnePlus 12R’s brightness advantage is significant, impacting outdoor usability. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to balance smoothness and power consumption, but the OnePlus 12R’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the iQOO Z10 Turbo+, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely target a similar mid-range camera experience. The OnePlus 12R’s image processing is known for its natural color reproduction, while iQOO typically leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS on the iQOO makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the OnePlus 12R. We can assume both phones will include a standard suite of camera modes, but the OnePlus 12R’s established image processing pipeline provides a more predictable outcome.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) utilizes a new CPU architecture – Cortex-X925, X4, and A720 – promising significant gains over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3, A715, A710, and A510 cores. The 3nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 9400+ should translate to improved thermal efficiency and sustained performance compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 remains a powerhouse, the Dimensity 9400+ is positioned to deliver a noticeable performance uplift, particularly in demanding tasks. The iQOO’s chipset is likely to excel in benchmarks and graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R boasts a strong battery performance, achieving 14 hours and 32 minutes of active use. While the iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s battery capacity is unknown, its Dimensity 9400+ chipset’s improved efficiency could partially offset a potentially smaller battery. The OnePlus 12R’s 100W charging, reaching 100% in 26 minutes, is slightly faster than the iQOO Z10 Turbo+’s 90W wired charging. The iQOO also supports 55W PD/PPS and reverse wired charging, adding versatility. The OnePlus 12R’s longer battery life and slightly faster charging provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ if you demand the absolute latest in mobile processing power, anticipate heavy gaming, and value the potential for sustained peak performance. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize all-day battery life, a consistently smooth experience, and a more established software ecosystem, all at a competitive price point.