The iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and Honor X50 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range flagship space. The iQOO leverages the cutting-edge Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, while the Honor opts for the established Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9400+ chipset, built on a 3nm process, offers a significant performance advantage. However, the Honor X50 GT remains a strong contender for those seeking a refined experience with a proven chipset and potentially better thermal management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 07 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 07 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4320Hz PWM, 2000 nits (HBM), 5500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PD/PPS
Reverse wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Gray, Gold | Black, Silver |
| Models | V2507A | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Significantly faster processor with Dimensity 9400+
- Ultra-fast 90W wired charging
- Potential for improved camera processing
- Potentially higher thermal output
- Newer chipset may have initial software quirks
Honor X50 GT
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Mature platform with optimized drivers
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Slower 35W wired charging
- Older chipset architecture
Display Comparison
While display specifications are absent from the provided data, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, typical of their market segment. However, the chipset differences indirectly impact display performance. The Dimensity 9400+'s superior GPU could drive higher frame rates in games. The Honor X50 GT's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while older, is still capable of excellent display output, but may be slightly less efficient at rendering complex visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a vital role. The Dimensity 9400+ likely features an upgraded ISP capable of faster image processing and improved noise reduction. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1's ISP is also highly capable, but may fall slightly behind in processing speed. The absence of information on sensor size and OIS makes a detailed comparison impossible, but the iQOO's newer chipset *could* translate to better computational photography.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z10 Turbo+'s Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) boasts a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. This configuration promises a substantial leap in CPU performance compared to the Honor X50 GT’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) with its Cortex-X2 (3.0 GHz), Cortex-A710 (2.5 GHz), and Cortex-A510 (1.8 GHz) cores. The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9400+ should also offer improved power efficiency, though real-world thermal performance will be crucial. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while on a larger 4nm node, is a mature platform with well-optimized drivers and thermal solutions.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z10 Turbo+ features 90W wired charging and 55W PD/PPS, alongside reverse wired charging. The Honor X50 GT offers a slower 35W wired charging and 7.5W reverse wired charging. This charging speed disparity is significant; the iQOO can likely achieve a full charge in under 40 minutes, while the Honor will take considerably longer. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the iQOO mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, offering more convenient top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ if you demand the absolute fastest performance for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to potentially manage slightly higher thermal output. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prioritize a balanced experience with a well-established chipset, potentially better sustained performance under load, and a more conservative power profile.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9400+ in the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9400+'s 3nm process aims to improve thermal efficiency, but its higher clock speeds and core count mean it *could* generate more heat than the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. iQOO's cooling solution will be critical. Expect some throttling under sustained load, but the overall performance advantage should still be noticeable.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT still a capable chipset for demanding games in 2024?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 remains a very powerful chipset, capable of running most modern games at high settings. While it won't match the raw performance of the Dimensity 9400+, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience, especially considering its mature optimization.
❓ How much faster is the 90W charging on the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X50 GT?
The 90W charging on the iQOO Z10 Turbo+ will significantly reduce charging times. Expect a full charge in approximately 35-45 minutes, while the Honor X50 GT will likely take over 90 minutes to reach 100%.
