Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro vs vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers demonstrably higher performance, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and its 120W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the iQOO Z10 Turbo offers a strong value proposition, the K70 Pro’s raw power justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 28 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 28 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 2000 nits (HBM), 4400 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | G720 MC7 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 100% in 55 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7620 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Orange, Gold | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | V2452A | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- More affordable price point
- Competent Dimensity 8400 performance
- Fast 90W wired charging
- Less powerful chipset than the K70 Pro
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potential for increased heat under sustained load (though mitigated by Snapdragon's thermal design)
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels given their market positioning. However, the Redmi K70 Pro, typical of Xiaomi’s flagship offerings, is expected to have a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving power efficiency. The iQOO Z10 Turbo, while still offering a vibrant display, may prioritize cost savings in this area. Bezels are likely comparable, but color accuracy and calibration could differentiate the experience, favoring the K70 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, we can infer that the Redmi K70 Pro, being a Pro model, will likely feature a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities. Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera performance in its Pro series. The iQOO Z10 Turbo will likely offer a competent camera system, but may compromise on sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) to maintain a lower price point. Lens apertures will be a key differentiator, with wider apertures on the K70 Pro allowing for better low-light performance. The inclusion of OIS on the K70 Pro is also probable, further enhancing image stability.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a 1+3+2+2 core configuration with a peak clock speed of 3.3 GHz on its Cortex-X4 prime core, offering a significant performance advantage over the iQOO Z10 Turbo’s Dimensity 8400 (4nm). The Dimensity 8400, with its 1+3+4 core setup peaking at 3.25 GHz, is still a capable performer, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architectural improvements and higher clock speeds translate to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, but Qualcomm’s architecture generally provides better sustained performance due to superior thermal management. The K70 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances its performance edge.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 18 minutes. This is significantly faster than the iQOO Z10 Turbo’s 90W charging, which takes 55 minutes to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the K70 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Both support reverse wired charging, adding to their versatility. The K70 Pro’s support for PD3.0 and QC3+ also provides broader compatibility with charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo if you prioritize a balance of performance and affordability, and are comfortable with slightly longer charging times. It’s ideal for everyday users and casual gamers. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, or power-intensive applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. It’s the better choice for enthusiasts and those who need a phone that can handle anything.