iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro vs Redmi K70E: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and incredibly fast charging, the iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 offers a slight edge in CPU performance, and the 120W charging is significantly faster than the Redmi K70E’s 90W. However, the K70E remains a strong contender, especially for those seeking a balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K70E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 28 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 28 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, 2000 nits (HBM), 4400 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PD, 100W PPS, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 33 min Reverse wired | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC2, 100% in 34 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Orange, Gold | Black, White, Mint |
| Models | V2453A | 2311DRK48C |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
- More balanced core configuration for multi-tasking
- Software experience may be less refined than Xiaomi's MIUI
- Camera specs unknown, potential for compromise
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
- Balanced performance from Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Xiaomi's MIUI offers a feature-rich software experience
- Slower 90W charging
- CPU performance slightly behind Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (specs not provided), the focus here is on internal power. The chipset choice will influence how smoothly those displays operate under load. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4’s more powerful GPU could translate to higher sustained frame rates in graphically intensive games, assuming both phones have comparable display panels. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, the provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given the price point, we can expect both phones to feature capable camera systems. The iQOO brand often emphasizes fast shutter speeds and image stabilization for action shots, while Xiaomi typically focuses on computational photography and vibrant color profiles. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, it’s impossible to definitively declare a winner. We can assume both will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the quality will depend heavily on the sensor and image processing.
Performance
The core of the comparison lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) boasts a 1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, indicating a focus on single-core performance. The Redmi K70E’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) utilizes a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core. While the Dimensity has a slightly higher clock speed on its prime core, the Snapdragon’s Cortex-X4 architecture generally offers superior performance per clock cycle. The Snapdragon also features a more balanced core configuration with three Cortex-A720 cores at 3.0 GHz, compared to the K70E’s three Cortex-A715 cores at 3.20 GHz. This suggests the iQOO may handle multi-threaded workloads more efficiently. The iQOO also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, though this isn't explicitly stated. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is known to run relatively cool, potentially allowing for sustained peak performance.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 33 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Redmi K70E’s 90W charging, which takes 34 minutes for a full charge. While the Redmi K70E supports PD3.0 and QC2, the iQOO’s inclusion of 100W PD and PPS offers broader compatibility and potentially faster charging with compatible accessories. The actual battery capacity isn’t specified, but the faster charging of the iQOO mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available and prioritize peak CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70E if you prefer a slightly more refined software experience (depending on MIUI preference) and value a balanced approach to performance and battery life, potentially benefiting from slightly better sustained performance due to thermal characteristics.