The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro and vivo iQOO Z10 Lite represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, they target slightly different priorities – the X6 Pro aiming for flagship-adjacent performance, and the Z10 Lite focusing on essential features at an even lower price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging and a brighter display, justifies the price premium. However, the iQOO Z10 Lite remains a viable option for those prioritizing absolute affordability and light usage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 18 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Blue, Cyber Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | I2409 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | ₹ 10,498 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Z10 Lite
- Most affordable option
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Functional and reliable
- Slow 15W charging
- Significantly weaker processor
- Likely lower display quality
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- 67W fast charging (45 min to 100%)
- Bright and vibrant display (1148 nits)
- Excellent battery life (11:46h active use)
- Higher price point
- May be overkill for basic users
- No official IP rating
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Z10 Lite (brightness data unavailable, assumed lower based on price point). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Xiaomi’s display track record) offer a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency, but the X6 Pro’s overall display quality is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data on the iQOO Z10 Lite. However, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to feature a more capable camera system, likely with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely symbolic, the X6 Pro’s overall camera hardware and software are likely to produce more detailed and vibrant photos and videos. The absence of OIS information for both devices suggests image stabilization will rely primarily on software solutions.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, fabricated on a 4nm process, is a powerhouse. Its octa-core configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance than the iQOO Z10 Lite’s Dimensity 6300 (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning the X6 Pro is less likely to throttle under sustained load. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a far superior gaming experience on the Poco.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes with support for QC2.0 and PD3.0. This is a massive advantage over the iQOO Z10 Lite’s slow 15W charging. While the X6 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 11:46h indicates excellent battery life. The faster charging speed mitigates any potential concerns about a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z10 Lite if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and your budget is extremely limited. You'll appreciate its affordability and acceptable performance for everyday use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding apps, and faster charging. The X6 Pro’s superior processing power and display quality will provide a noticeably smoother and more enjoyable user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is fabricated on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency than the 6nm Dimensity 6300 in the iQOO Z10 Lite. While some heat generation is inevitable during demanding tasks, the X6 Pro is expected to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance for longer periods.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the iQOO Z10 Lite realistically usable in 2024?
While functional, 15W charging is significantly slower than the 67W offered by the Poco X6 Pro. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours, which may be inconvenient for users accustomed to faster charging speeds. It's best suited for overnight charging or topping up when the device isn't urgently needed.
❓ How does the CPU architecture of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra compare to the Dimensity 6300 in terms of real-world performance?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra utilizes newer Cortex-A715 cores, which offer a substantial performance uplift over the Cortex-A76 cores found in the Dimensity 6300. The X6 Pro also benefits from a more efficient core configuration and a more advanced manufacturing process, resulting in significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience.
