iQOO Z1 vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme X50 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. While the iQOO Z1 offers a compelling chipset, the Snapdragon 865’s more mature optimization and 65W charging provide a smoother, more convenient experience, especially considering both phones offer similar battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z1 | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 19. Released 2020, June 01 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min, 100% in 59 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galaxy Silver, Space blue | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | V1986A | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Z1
- Potentially higher multi-core CPU performance due to core count.
- Competitive chipset for its time.
- 44W fast charging is still respectable.
- Less refined chipset optimization compared to Snapdragon.
- Slower charging speed than the X50 Pro 5G.
- Lack of detailed display and camera specifications.
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Faster 65W charging with PD support.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- More mature chipset optimization for sustained performance.
- Older generation chipset.
- May experience some software update limitations.
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load.
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the iQOO Z1. While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the higher peak brightness of the X50 Pro 5G translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. The lack of detailed display specs for the Z1, such as refresh rate or panel type, puts it at a disadvantage. The X50 Pro 5G’s brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Realme’s historical focus on camera features, it’s reasonable to assume the X50 Pro 5G likely offers a more versatile and refined camera system. The absence of any specific camera details for the iQOO Z1 suggests it may be a less emphasized feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) features a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, alongside three additional Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.42 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The iQOO Z1’s Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) counters with four 2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 cores and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Z1 has more high-performance cores, the Snapdragon 865 benefits from Qualcomm’s superior software optimization and a more mature manufacturing process. This translates to better sustained performance and potentially less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both utilize 7nm fabrication, but the 'plus' designation on the Snapdragon 865 indicates a refinement of the process.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging with PD support is significantly faster, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. The iQOO Z1’s 44W charging takes 59 minutes for a full charge, and 23 minutes to reach 50%. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either, the faster charging of the X50 Pro 5G provides a more convenient user experience, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z1 if you need a phone primarily for demanding tasks like mobile gaming and content creation, and are willing to manage slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you prefer a more refined overall experience with faster charging, a brighter display, and a chipset known for its stability and broader software support, even if it's an older generation.