iQOO Z1 vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more polished software experience, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the better choice. However, the iQOO Z1 delivers comparable performance at a significantly lower cost, making it ideal for budget-conscious gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z1 | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 19. Released 2020, June 01 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min, 100% in 59 min | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galaxy Silver, Space blue | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | V1986A | KB2007 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 640 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z1
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Powerful Dimensity 1000+ chipset
- Respectable 44W fast charging
- Potentially less refined software experience
- May exhibit more thermal throttling under heavy load
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Snapdragon 865 offers strong performance and efficiency
- Polished software experience
- Higher price point
- May not offer a significant performance leap over the iQOO Z1 for everyday tasks
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate panels common in this price bracket. However, the core difference lies in the chipsets powering them. The Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) will likely offer slightly better image processing capabilities, even if the panels themselves are similar. The iQOO Z1’s display performance will be heavily reliant on Mediatek’s image processing algorithms.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the Snapdragon 865’s ISP provides a processing advantage. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially better low-light performance. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will hinge on sensor size and lens apertures – data not provided. The iQOO Z1 will rely on Mediatek’s ISP capabilities, which have improved but generally lag behind Qualcomm’s.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 in the OnePlus 8T+ 5G, fabricated on a 7nm+ process, boasts a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz, alongside three additional A77 cores at 2.42 GHz. This contrasts with the iQOO Z1’s Dimensity 1000+ which features four Cortex-A77 cores at 2.6 GHz and four A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. While the iQOO Z1 has more high-performance cores, the Snapdragon 865’s architecture and process node give it an edge in sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 650 GPU also surpasses the Dimensity 1000+'s Mali-G57 MC4 in graphical prowess, benefiting demanding games. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G will likely exhibit less throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z1’s 44W charging, reaching 100% in 59 minutes, is respectable. However, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s 65W charging, achieving a full charge in just 39 minutes, is significantly faster. This difference is substantial for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the OnePlus 8T+ 5G effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery, offering more usable uptime throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z1 if you need maximum performance for your dollar, frequently engage in extended gaming sessions, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you prefer incredibly fast 65W charging, a smoother, more established software ecosystem, and are willing to pay a premium for those benefits.