iQOO Z1 vs Huawei nova 7 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the vivo iQOO Z1 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ chipset provides a noticeable edge in CPU and GPU performance, while its 44W charging is quicker overall. However, the nova 7 Pro 5G offers reverse wireless charging and a potentially more refined software experience, appealing to a different user profile.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Z1 | Huawei nova 7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 19. Released 2020, June 01 | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.4 x 73.7 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | OLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Kirin 985 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 (8-core) |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 10, EMUI 10, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min, 100% in 59 min | 40W wired, 75% in 30 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galaxy Silver, Space blue | Black, Red, Purple, Green, Blue |
| Models | V1986A | JER-AN10, JER-AN20 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 480 EUR |
vivo iQOO Z1
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Dimensity 1000+
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management for sustained performance
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
- Software experience may be less refined than Huawei
Huawei nova 7 Pro 5G
- Includes 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially more polished software experience
- Sleek design (based on Huawei's historical design language)
- Inferior CPU and GPU performance compared to Dimensity 1000+
- Slower overall charging time
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature AMOLED panels. The nova 7 Pro, historically, has prioritized display quality in its series, potentially offering slightly better color accuracy and brightness. The iQOO Z1, being geared towards gaming, may prioritize a higher refresh rate (though not specified) for smoother visuals. Bezels are likely comparable, falling within the typical range for mid-range devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a precise camera comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature multi-camera setups. The iQOO Z1 likely prioritizes overall image quality and processing speed, leveraging the Dimensity 1000+'s ISP capabilities. The Huawei nova 7 Pro 5G, benefiting from Huawei’s long-standing camera expertise, may excel in computational photography and scene recognition. The absence of OIS specifications for either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Z1’s Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) boasts a more modern CPU architecture with its Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the Huawei nova 7 Pro 5G’s Kirin 985 5G (7nm) which utilizes Cortex-A76 cores at 2.58 GHz. This architectural advantage, combined with the higher clock speeds, translates to a performance lead for the iQOO Z1 in CPU-intensive tasks. The Dimensity 1000+ also features a more powerful Mali-G57 MC4 GPU, offering a significant advantage in gaming performance. While both use 7nm fabrication, the Dimensity 1000+ generally demonstrates better sustained performance due to more efficient thermal management. The nova 7 Pro's CPU configuration (1x A76 + 3x A76 + 4x A55) is unusual, potentially indicating a focus on multi-threaded workloads, but it doesn't overcome the architectural advantage of the iQOO Z1.
Battery Life
Both devices offer fast charging, but with different implementations. The iQOO Z1’s 44W wired charging can reach 50% in 23 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, providing a quicker top-up. The Huawei nova 7 Pro 5G’s 40W wired charging reaches 75% in 30 minutes, suggesting a slower overall 0-100% time. The nova 7 Pro 5G also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Z1, allowing it to charge accessories like earbuds or smartwatches. Battery capacity is not specified, but the faster charging of the iQOO Z1 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Z1 if you need a phone optimized for gaming and demanding applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Its Dimensity 1000+ chipset delivers superior processing power. Buy the Huawei nova 7 Pro 5G if you prioritize a sleek design, reverse wireless charging for accessories, and a potentially more polished user interface, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance.