The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo iQOO U5x and Oppo K10x both aim to deliver value, but take different approaches. The iQOO U5x focuses on a reliable 4G experience with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 680, while the K10x leaps into 5G territory with the Snapdragon 695, alongside a significantly faster charging solution. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K10x is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift and future-proofs connectivity, while the 67W charging is a game-changer in this price bracket. The iQOO U5x remains a viable option for those prioritizing a stable 4G connection and minimal spending.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 28 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 28 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Blue, Black |
| Models | V2180GA | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 210 EUR |
vivo iQOO U5x
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 680 performance for basic tasks
- Stable 4G connectivity
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Less powerful chipset for demanding apps
Oppo K10x
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Future-proof 5G connectivity
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely a slightly higher price tag
- Potentially less battery life if capacity is lower than iQOO U5x
- May experience more heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this segment. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but functionality. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, the K10x’s potential for higher peak brightness due to its more powerful chipset could translate to better outdoor visibility. Bezels are expected to be similar, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones targeting the entry-level segment. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both will feature a primary camera and potentially depth/macro sensors of limited utility. The K10x’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 695 could offer slightly better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions, but don't expect flagship-level results from either device. Focusing on the primary sensor's megapixel count (if available) will be more indicative of image quality than the presence of auxiliary lenses.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10x’s Snapdragon 695 5G, built on a 6nm process, represents a significant step up from the iQOO U5x’s Snapdragon 680. The 695 features a more modern CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold vs 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold), and crucially, an integrated 5G modem. This translates to faster download/upload speeds and improved responsiveness in demanding applications. While the iQOO U5x’s Kryo 265 Gold cores clock higher, the architectural improvements in the 695, combined with the 6nm node, provide a more efficient and powerful experience. The K10x is the clear winner for users who multitask or play mobile games.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10x’s 67W charging is the standout feature here. Achieving 80% charge in just 33 minutes is a massive advantage over the iQOO U5x’s slow 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the K10x’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The iQOO U5x will require significantly longer to fully charge, making it less convenient for users who need a quick power boost. The Snapdragon 695’s improved efficiency could also contribute to slightly better battery life in the K10x, despite potentially having a similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO U5x if you primarily need a dependable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and 5G connectivity isn't a priority. You'll appreciate its simplicity and lower price point. Buy the Oppo K10x if you want a phone capable of handling more demanding apps, enjoy faster download speeds with 5G, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 67W charging – making it ideal for users on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo K10x's 5G connectivity actually make a difference in my daily use?
The benefit of 5G depends on your location and carrier coverage. If you live in an area with robust 5G infrastructure, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds, especially for streaming, gaming, and large file transfers. Even without widespread 5G, the K10x's modem supports a wider range of 4G bands, potentially improving connectivity in fringe areas.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the iQOO U5x realistically usable for someone who uses their phone heavily throughout the day?
10W charging is quite slow by modern standards. For heavy users, it will likely require overnight charging to ensure a full battery. The K10x’s 67W charging is a far more practical solution, allowing you to quickly top up the battery during short breaks.
❓ Can the Oppo K10x handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile at reasonable settings?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium or low graphics settings for a smooth experience. The iQOO U5x will struggle with these titles at higher settings due to its less powerful chipset.
❓ Does either phone have a headphone jack?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, phones in this price range often retain a 3.5mm headphone jack. It's highly probable both the iQOO U5x and K10x include one, but it's best to confirm with the retailer or manufacturer before purchasing if this is a critical feature for you.
