Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. vivo iQOO U5e: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 67W charging, capable of a full charge in just 41 minutes, is a game-changer. While the iQOO U5e boasts a more efficient chipset, the Poco’s overall package offers a more compelling user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO U5e | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2197A | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO U5e
- More power-efficient chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Potentially longer battery life during light use
- Competitive price point
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Less powerful CPU architecture compared to Snapdragon 695
- Limited detailed specifications available
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (full charge in 41 minutes)
- More advanced CPU architecture (Snapdragon 695)
- Likely more versatile camera system
- Slightly less power-efficient chipset
- May run warmer under sustained load
- Similar battery life rating to iQOO U5e despite less efficient chip
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device is a common cost-saving measure in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s safe to assume both will rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this price bracket suggests they are largely marketing features and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s camera system is likely to be more versatile due to Xiaomi’s generally more aggressive camera hardware choices in this segment.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the iQOO U5e features the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 generally translates to better power efficiency compared to the 7nm Dimensity 700. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally more advanced than the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700, potentially offering a slight edge in sustained performance. The iQOO U5e’s efficiency could lead to longer battery life during less intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a massive advantage. Achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes significantly reduces downtime. The iQOO U5e’s 18W charging is comparatively slow, requiring considerably longer to fully replenish the battery. This difference in charging speed is the most significant differentiator between the two devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO U5e if you prioritize long-term efficiency and are less concerned with rapid charging. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset offers a good balance of performance and power consumption, making it ideal for moderate users. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value fast charging above all else, and need a phone that can quickly top up its battery, even if it means slightly less efficiency.