The iQOO U5e and Oppo K10 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to chipset selection and charging technology. This comparison dissects those differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K10 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 810 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable performance uplift over the iQOO U5e’s Dimensity 700. The significantly faster 33W charging also provides a more convenient user experience, making it worth the potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2022, June 01 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, June 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 53% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | V2197A | CPH2337 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 270 EUR |
vivo iQOO U5e
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the K10 5G
- Likely less efficient power consumption
Oppo K10 5G
- Faster Dimensity 810 chipset for improved performance
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- More efficient 6nm process
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
- Camera performance likely similar to iQOO U5e
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internal components, we can infer both likely utilize standard 60Hz LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding peak brightness or color accuracy suggests neither prioritizes display quality. Bezels are likely comparable, aiming for maximum screen real estate within the budget constraints. Users seeking vibrant colors or high refresh rates will need to look elsewhere.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera and supporting lenses. The market segment suggests a focus on affordability, meaning sensor sizes are likely modest. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also probable. Image processing will likely differ between the two brands, with Oppo historically leaning towards more saturated and vibrant images, while iQOO may aim for a more natural look. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lens on either device is questionable, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 5G’s Dimensity 810 (6nm) holds a clear advantage over the iQOO U5e’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to improved thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. While both CPUs share the same Cortex-A76 and A55 core configuration, the K10 5G’s higher clock speeds (2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz) further contribute to its performance edge. This benefits users who frequently engage in mobile gaming or resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10 5G’s 33W charging is a significant advantage. The claim of 53% charge in 30 minutes drastically reduces downtime compared to the iQOO U5e’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential difference in mAh. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone throughout the day will greatly appreciate the K10 5G’s quicker charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO U5e if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for basic 5G connectivity and everyday tasks. Buy the Oppo K10 5G if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly quicker 33W charging. It’s the better choice for users who demand more from their smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 810 in the Oppo K10 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 810 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process and higher clock speeds provide a performance boost over the Dimensity 700, reducing the likelihood of significant frame drops during extended gaming sessions. However, don't expect flagship-level graphics settings.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo K10 5G from 0% with the 33W charger?
While Oppo claims 53% in 30 minutes, a full 0-100% charge with the 33W charger is estimated to take around 60-70 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the iQOO U5e’s 18W charging, which would likely take over 2 hours for a complete charge.
❓ Is the iQOO U5e a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls, texts, and social media?
Absolutely. The iQOO U5e is perfectly adequate for basic smartphone tasks like calls, texts, and social media browsing. The Dimensity 700 chipset is sufficient for these everyday activities, and the 5G connectivity ensures fast data speeds when available. It's a cost-effective choice for users with modest smartphone needs.
