The vivo iQOO U5 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) both target the competitive mid-range 5G market, powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. However, despite sharing the same chipset, these phones diverge significantly in key areas, most notably charging speed. This comparison dissects the nuances to help you choose the right device for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and minimizing downtime, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the clear winner. Its 67W charging dramatically reduces charging times, a tangible benefit that outweighs the iQOO U5’s potentially lower price. While performance is identical, the Redmi’s faster charging is a game-changer.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 24 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Gray, Aurora | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2165A | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo iQOO U5
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Adequate performance for everyday tasks
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely less advanced camera system
- May have a less vibrant display
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Potentially superior camera system
- PD3.0 and QC3 charging support
- Higher price compared to iQOO U5
- Performance is identical to iQOO U5
- May not be significantly better in all camera scenarios
Display Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature similar LCD panels, given their price points. However, detailed display specs (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) are missing. The iQOO U5’s display quality will likely be adequate for everyday use, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G may offer a slightly more vibrant experience if Xiaomi employs its typical color calibration. Bezels are expected to be comparable, with neither phone aiming for flagship-level screen-to-body ratios.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi typically emphasizes camera capabilities in its Redmi Note series. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO U5 will likely offer a serviceable camera for casual photography, but the Redmi is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and should not be a deciding factor.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both phones utilize the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G with an octa-core CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). This means app launch times, multitasking, and general responsiveness will be nearly indistinguishable. The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chip for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, but demanding titles will require reduced graphics settings. RAM configurations are unknown, but LPDDR4X is probable in both, limiting potential performance gains. Thermal management will be crucial; the 6nm process node is efficient, but sustained loads could lead to throttling.
Battery Life
This is where the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G truly shines. While battery capacity is unknown for both, the 67W wired charging (with PD3.0 and QC3 support) is a significant advantage. Xiaomi claims a 50% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The iQOO U5’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed translates to a much more convenient user experience, especially for those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO U5 if you are on a strict budget and prioritize a functional 5G experience without needing the fastest possible charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value rapid charging, minimizing downtime, and are willing to spend a bit more for the convenience of a full charge in under an hour.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 is a capable chip, Genshin Impact will require significant compromises in graphics settings to achieve playable frame rates. Expect to use low or medium settings and potentially lower the resolution for a smoother experience. It's not designed for high-end gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 18W charging on the iQOO U5 in real-world usage?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can go from 0-100% in approximately 42 minutes, while the iQOO U5 will likely take well over 2 hours. This means you can get a significant charge boost in a short amount of time with the Redmi, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G support VoLTE and VoWiFi in India?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is confirmed to support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) on all major Indian telecom networks, ensuring seamless voice calls even in areas with poor cellular coverage.
