vivo iQOO U5 vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison

The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo iQOO U5 and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank. However, they take different approaches – the iQOO U5 prioritizes chipset efficiency, while the Galaxy A53 focuses on a brighter display and established brand recognition. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and brand trust, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, those seeking a more power-efficient processor and potentially better long-term performance, especially in sustained tasks, will find the iQOO U5 a compelling alternative.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo iQOO U5 Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U
5G bands1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1x 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V
Launch
Announced2021, December 242022, March 17
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, January 01Available. Released 2022, March 24
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in)159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight185 g (6.53 oz)189 g (6.67 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density)
Size6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68
OSAndroid 12, OriginOS OceanAndroid 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.2-
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro)-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single8 MP, f/1.8, (wide)32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single8 MP, f/1.8, (wide)32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent)
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging18W wired25W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsWhite, Gray, AuroraBlack, White, Blue, Peach
ModelsV2165ASM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL
PriceAbout 180 EUR$ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14
SAR-0.75 W/kg (head)     1.58 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.89 W/kg (head)     1.60 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 113h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.5 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo iQOO U5

  • More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
  • Potentially better sustained performance
  • Likely more affordable price point

  • Less established brand reputation
  • Likely lower display brightness and quality
  • Slower charging speed (18W)

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

  • Brighter and more vibrant display (830 nits)
  • Faster 25W wired charging
  • Strong brand recognition and software support

  • Exynos 1280 may be prone to throttling
  • Potentially lower power efficiency
  • Generally higher price

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 830 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the iQOO U5’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be lower in peak brightness. The A53’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a Super AMOLED panel, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors compared to the likely LCD panel on the iQOO U5. This makes the A53 a better choice for media consumption and gaming where visual fidelity is paramount.

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the iQOO U5. The Galaxy A53 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system, benefiting from Samsung’s image processing expertise. While both phones likely include a standard and ultrawide lens, the A53’s potential for Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) – a common feature in Samsung’s A-series – would provide sharper images and smoother video, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit due to its low resolution.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G utilizes the Exynos 1280 (5nm), while the iQOO U5 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 5nm process node of the Exynos 1280 *should* offer better power efficiency, but the Snapdragon 695’s architecture, with its Kryo 660 Gold cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, provides a strong performance base. The Exynos 1280’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer a theoretical single-core performance advantage, but the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 may lead to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling under heavy load. The iQOO U5’s efficiency is a key benefit for users who frequently engage in demanding tasks.

Battery Life

Both the iQOO U5 and Galaxy A53 5G share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the Galaxy A53 5G supports 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the iQOO U5’s 18W charging. This means the A53 can replenish its battery more quickly, reducing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the A53 provides a tangible advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo iQOO U5 if you need a phone that prioritizes sustained performance and efficiency for tasks like prolonged gaming or video recording, and are comfortable with a less-established brand. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, a well-known brand with a strong software ecosystem, and are willing to trade some raw processing power for a more polished overall experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280 has been known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained load, particularly in graphically demanding games. While Samsung’s software optimizations mitigate this to some extent, users may experience frame rate drops after extended gaming. The iQOO U5’s Snapdragon 695, with its 6nm process, may offer better thermal management in these scenarios.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using for detailed close-up shots?
Generally, no. 2MP macro cameras suffer from limited detail and dynamic range. The small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization result in blurry and often unusable images. They are primarily included for marketing purposes and offer little practical benefit compared to using the main camera in close-up mode.
❓ Can the iQOO U5 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at 90fps?
While the Snapdragon 695 is capable, achieving a consistent 90fps in PUBG Mobile will likely require reduced graphics settings. The iQOO U5’s thermal performance will also play a role; prolonged gaming at high settings may lead to throttling and frame rate drops. The Galaxy A53 5G may offer a more stable, albeit potentially lower, frame rate due to its more powerful GPU.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the iQOO U5 and the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G?
Samsung’s One UI offers a feature-rich and polished software experience with a strong emphasis on customization and integration with Samsung’s ecosystem. iQOO’s software, based on Android, is likely to be more streamlined and less bloated, but may lack the same level of refinement and long-term software support as Samsung’s offering.