The iQOO U5 and Oppo K10x represent a fascinating intersection in the budget 5G smartphone market. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, promising similar performance. However, Oppo significantly differentiates the K10x with its dramatically faster 67W charging, creating a key point of divergence for potential buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and minimal downtime, the Oppo K10x is the clear winner. While the iQOO U5 offers a comparable experience in most areas, the K10x’s 67W charging – capable of reaching 80% in just 33 minutes – fundamentally alters the usability and reduces range anxiety.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 24 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 01 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Gray, Aurora | Blue, Black |
| Models | V2165A | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 210 EUR |
vivo iQOO U5
- Potentially lower price point
- Similar CPU performance to K10x
- Reliable brand reputation (vivo)
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior camera performance
- May lack premium features
Oppo K10x
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (80% in 33 min)
- Convenient for on-the-go users
- Potentially better software optimization
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar CPU performance to iQOO U5
- Potential for bloatware (Oppo)
Display Comparison
Both the iQOO U5 and Oppo K10x are expected to feature LCD panels, typical for this price segment. Specific details like resolution and refresh rate are not provided, but we can assume both target a 1080p+ resolution. The lack of information regarding peak brightness or color gamut coverage suggests neither device will excel in outdoor visibility or color accuracy. Bezels are likely to be comparable, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones will employ a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is highly probable in this price range. Image processing will likely differ between vivo and Oppo, potentially resulting in variations in color science and dynamic range. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lens is questionable, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core of both devices is the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical between the two. The GPU performance will also be the same. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is likely, and thermal management will be crucial to sustain performance during extended gaming sessions. Neither phone is expected to exhibit flagship-level performance, but should handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming adequately.
Battery Life
This is where the Oppo K10x truly shines. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the K10x’s 67W wired charging capability is a game-changer. The ability to reach 80% charge in just 33 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the iQOO U5’s slower 18W charging. Even with a slightly smaller battery, the K10x’s faster charging effectively mitigates range anxiety and provides a more convenient user experience. The iQOO U5 will require considerably longer to fully charge, potentially exceeding two hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO U5 if you are on an extremely tight budget and are willing to sacrifice charging speed for a lower initial cost. Buy the Oppo K10x if you value fast charging above all else, frequently find yourself needing to top up quickly, and appreciate the convenience of a significantly reduced charging time. Both phones are suitable for everyday tasks, but the K10x caters to a more demanding, on-the-go lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings with moderate frame rates. Sustained performance will depend on the K10x’s thermal management, and prolonged gaming sessions may result in some throttling. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's adequate for casual gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the iQOO U5's 18W charging in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo K10x can reach 80% charge in approximately 33 minutes, while the iQOO U5 will likely take well over two hours to fully charge. This means you can quickly top up the K10x during a short break, whereas the U5 requires a much longer charging commitment.
❓ Does the Oppo K10x's fast charging generate excessive heat?
Oppo employs various technologies to mitigate heat generation during fast charging. While some warmth is expected, the K10x is designed to manage the heat effectively and prevent damage to the battery. However, charging in extremely hot environments is still not recommended.
