iQOO Pro vs Oppo Reno Ace: A Deep Dive into Two Snapdragon 855+ Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno Ace emerges as the stronger choice. Its 65W SuperVOOC charging, capable of a full charge in just 30 minutes, is a game-changer. While the iQOO Pro offers a solid experience, the Reno Ace’s faster charging and comparable performance provide a more compelling overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Pro | Oppo Reno Ace |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2019, October. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 75.7 x 9.3 mm (6.25 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.41 inches, 100.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@1920fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; (gyro-EIS); video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.28µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Electric purple, Interstellar blue, Gundam Edition |
| Models | V1922A, V1922A | PCLM10 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.0dB / Crosstalk -93.3dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 79dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 87dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 354367 (v7), 434063 (v8) GeekBench: 11008 (v4.4), 2627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Pro
- Potentially more conservative design aesthetic.
- Solid Snapdragon 855+ performance.
- Reliable 44W fast charging.
- Slower charging compared to the Reno Ace.
- Display brightness likely lower than the Reno Ace.
- Limited camera specification details.
Oppo Reno Ace
- Industry-leading 65W SuperVOOC charging.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed.
- Design may be more polarizing.
- Limited camera specification details.
- Potential for faster battery degradation with frequent fast charging.
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno Ace boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 717 nits of peak brightness, making it significantly more usable in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks, the Reno Ace’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Reno Ace, typical of AMOLED technology, while the iQOO Pro’s contrast ratio is not specified. Without PWM dimming rate data for either device, it’s difficult to assess potential flicker-related eye strain, but this is a key consideration for sensitive users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both feature multi-camera setups, but the quality and features will depend heavily on the specific components used. The absence of detail suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer, focusing instead on overall performance and features.
Performance
Both the iQOO Pro and Reno Ace are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ (7nm), but subtle CPU clock speed differences exist. The Reno Ace edges out the iQOO Pro with a 2.96 GHz Kryo 485 prime core versus the iQOO Pro’s 2.84 GHz core. While this difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday tasks, it *could* translate to slightly faster single-core performance in benchmarks. Both devices feature an identical CPU configuration for the remaining cores (3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz/1.78 GHz). RAM speed and capacity are not specified, but both likely utilize LPDDR4X, common for this chipset generation. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 855+ is known to throttle under sustained load, and the effectiveness of each phone’s cooling solution will determine long-term performance.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno Ace’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is its defining feature, promising a full charge in just 30 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the iQOO Pro’s 44W wired charging. Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99h, suggesting similar battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (capacity data missing). The Reno Ace’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage, allowing users to quickly replenish their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Pro if you prioritize a slightly more conservative design and are less reliant on ultra-fast charging. It’s a good option for users who charge overnight or don’t frequently deplete their battery. Buy the Oppo Reno Ace if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds and value a brighter display for outdoor visibility. This phone is ideal for power users and gamers who need to quickly top up their battery between sessions.