iQOO Pro vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 855+ Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw charging speed and potentially slightly better sustained performance, the iQOO Pro emerges as the winner. Its 44W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the marginally higher CPU clock speed, while not dramatically different, offers a small edge in demanding tasks. However, OnePlus’s software and established ecosystem remain compelling advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Pro | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 75.7 x 9.3 mm (6.25 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.41 inches, 100.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@1920fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.28µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Papaya Orange |
| Models | V1922A, V1922A | HD1925 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 800 EUR |
vivo iQOO Pro
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed
- Potentially more aggressive cooling system
- Funtouch OS may not appeal to all users
- Brand recognition is lower than OnePlus
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Refined OxygenOS software experience
- Established brand reputation and support
- Likely better software update longevity
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Marginally lower CPU clock speed
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays, though specific details like panel type (OLED is assumed for both) and resolution aren't provided. The key difference lies elsewhere. While both likely offer high refresh rates, the iQOO Pro’s potential for higher peak brightness (based on vivo’s display technology) could translate to better outdoor visibility. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting the flagship status. Color accuracy is likely comparable, relying on standard OLED calibration techniques.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the sensor sizes and lens apertures are unknown. The image processing style will likely differ – OnePlus typically aims for a more natural look, while vivo often employs more vibrant, saturated colors. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor is highly probable for both, crucial for low-light photography and video recording. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors are likely to be of limited utility.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) chipset. However, the iQOO Pro boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed of 2.84 GHz compared to the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 2.96 GHz. While this 0.12 GHz difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks, it *could* translate to marginally faster processing in CPU-intensive applications. Both utilize an octa-core configuration (1x2.84/2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485). RAM speed (likely LPDDR4X in both) and storage type (UFS 3.0 is probable) are not specified, but thermal management will be crucial. The iQOO Pro, often marketed towards gamers, may have a more aggressive cooling solution.
Battery Life
The iQOO Pro’s 44W wired charging is a significant advantage over the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 30W wired charging. This translates to substantially faster charging times – potentially reducing a full charge from over an hour to under 45 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery in the iQOO Pro. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren will still offer respectable charging speeds, but the iQOO Pro’s 44W implementation is a clear win for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Pro if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and are comfortable with vivo’s Funtouch OS. This phone is ideal for power users who frequently drain their battery and demand minimal downtime. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prefer a refined software experience with OxygenOS, value a more established brand reputation, and don’t mind a slightly slower charging speed. It’s the better choice for users who prioritize software polish and long-term support.