vivo iQOO Pro 5G vs Honor V30 Pro: A Head-to-Head 5G Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained gaming performance and a straightforward experience, the vivo iQOO Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 855+ offers a slight edge in raw power, and while lacking wireless charging, its 44W wired charging is competitive. The Honor V30 Pro is a strong contender for those valuing display quality and versatile charging options.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Pro 5G | Honor V30 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, September | 2019, November. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 75.7 x 9.3 mm (6.25 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) | 162.7 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Yes |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.41 inches, 100.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 40 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1.4µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@1920fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.28µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min 27W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Ocean Blue, Galaxy Black, Icelandic frost |
| Models | V1916A, V1916T | OXF-AN10 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 381241 (v7), 500571 (v8) GeekBench: 12824 (v4.4), 3204 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Pro 5G
- Faster wired charging (44W)
- Potentially better gaming performance due to Adreno 640 GPU
- Snapdragon 855+ is a well-understood platform
- Lacks wireless charging
- Display specs are unknown, potentially inferior to V30 Pro
- No reverse wireless charging
Honor V30 Pro
- Brighter display (534 nits)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Kirin 990 5G offers refined 7nm+ process
- Kirin 990 potentially prone to thermal throttling
- Wired charging slightly slower (40W)
- Image processing may be overly saturated for some users
Display Comparison
The Honor V30 Pro boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 534 nits. While the iQOO Pro’s display specs are not provided, the V30 Pro’s brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. The V30 Pro’s 1230:1 contrast ratio also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience. Without knowing the iQOO Pro’s panel type or color accuracy, it’s difficult to assess its overall display performance beyond basic functionality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is challenging. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. Image processing philosophies will likely differentiate the two; Honor typically favors vibrant, saturated colors, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. The absence of detailed camera specs makes it impossible to declare a clear winner.
Performance
Both devices utilize 7nm process technology, but the Kirin 990 5G (7nm+) in the Honor V30 Pro represents a refinement over the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ in the iQOO Pro. The Kirin 990’s architecture, with its 2x Cortex-A76 cores at 2.86 GHz, aims for higher single-core performance, while the Snapdragon 855+ relies on a single Kryo 485 core at 2.84 GHz. However, the Snapdragon 855+’s Adreno 640 GPU is generally considered superior for gaming. Thermal management will be crucial; the Kirin 990 has historically faced concerns about heat dissipation, potentially leading to throttling under sustained load, while the Snapdragon 855+ is a known quantity with well-understood thermal characteristics.
Battery Life
The Honor V30 Pro offers a more versatile charging solution with 40W wired charging (70% in 30 minutes), 27W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging. The iQOO Pro counters with 44W wired charging, potentially offering slightly faster full charges, but lacks wireless capabilities. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Honor V30 Pro’s charging flexibility caters to a wider range of user preferences. The inclusion of reverse wireless charging is a notable convenience feature for users with wireless earbuds or other compatible devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Pro 5G if you need uncompromising gaming performance and are willing to forgo wireless charging. It’s ideal for users who frequently engage in demanding mobile games and prioritize sustained frame rates. Buy the Honor V30 Pro if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, the convenience of wireless charging, and a more feature-rich overall package, even if it means a slight compromise in peak CPU performance.