vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+ vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw charging speed and potentially sustained gaming performance, the vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging significantly reduces downtime, and while battery capacity isn't specified, the focus on rapid replenishment suggests a gaming-centric design. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra counters with excellent battery life, but falls slightly behind in charging convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 11 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 16 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8 mm or 8.3 mm | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g or 198 g (6.81 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 70% in 17 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue/White, Black, White | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | V2403A | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | $ 546.64 |
vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for top-tier performance
- Likely optimized for sustained gaming
- No wireless charging
- Battery capacity unknown
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Excellent 12:47h battery life
- 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- High peak display brightness (1165 nits)
- Slower wired charging than iQOO Neo9S Pro+
- Potentially less aggressive thermal management
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, indicating a vibrant and easily viewable display even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo9S Pro+ display specifications are not provided, it's reasonable to expect a high-quality AMOLED panel given its flagship positioning. The absence of detailed display specs for the iQOO makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X7 Ultra’s brightness is a clear advantage. Both devices likely utilize adaptive refresh rate technology to balance smoothness and power consumption, though specific refresh rates are unknown.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the iQOO Neo9S Pro+ are unavailable, making a direct comparison challenging. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra, while not detailed in the provided data, is known for its advanced camera system. The absence of sensor information for the iQOO suggests it may not be a primary selling point, while Oppo typically emphasizes camera innovation in its Ultra series. The X7 Ultra likely features a sophisticated image processing pipeline and advanced features like OIS, offering a more comprehensive photographic experience.
Performance
Both the iQOO Neo9S Pro+ and the Oppo Find X7 Ultra are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an identical CPU configuration: 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This means theoretical processing power is nearly identical. However, the iQOO Neo9S Pro+’s focus on gaming suggests a more aggressive thermal management system to sustain peak performance for longer durations. The 4nm process node contributes to improved thermal efficiency in both devices, mitigating throttling during demanding tasks. RAM specifications are not provided for either device, but both are expected to utilize fast LPDDR5x RAM.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a strong battery performance with an active use score of 12:47h, indicating excellent endurance. The iQOO Neo9S Pro+ prioritizes charging speed with 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% in 17 minutes and 100% in 28 minutes. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra offers 100W wired charging (50% in 10 minutes, 100% in 26 minutes) and adds the convenience of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging. While the iQOO Neo9S Pro+ lacks wireless charging, its significantly faster wired charging compensates, appealing to users who frequently top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+ if you need the absolute fastest charging available and anticipate heavy usage, particularly gaming, where minimizing downtime is crucial. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize all-day battery life and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means slightly longer wired charging times. The X7 Ultra is also likely the better choice for users who value a more refined, all-around flagship experience.