iQOO Neo9S Pro vs Redmi K70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw gaming performance and established software optimization, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro edges out the iQOO Neo9S Pro. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s mature driver support and slightly more efficient architecture provide a smoother, more consistent experience, despite the iQOO’s impressive charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 20 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8 mm or 8.3 mm | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 40% in 9 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | V2339FA | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro
- Extremely fast initial charging (40% in 9 mins)
- Potentially higher CPU performance due to all-performance core design
- Competitive price point
- Mediatek chipset may have less optimized software support
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers excellent gaming performance
- Mature software ecosystem and optimization
- Potentially better power efficiency
- Slightly slower overall charging time (100% in 18 mins)
- May be marginally more expensive
Display Comparison
While both phones are expected to feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (specs not provided), the key differentiator will likely be peak brightness and color calibration. The Redmi K70 Pro, benefiting from Xiaomi’s display expertise, may offer a slightly wider color gamut and more accurate color reproduction. The iQOO Neo9S Pro, however, could potentially leverage a higher PWM dimming frequency for reduced eye strain, a crucial factor for users sensitive to flicker. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but real-world testing will reveal the winner.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, given the price points, both phones are likely to feature a primary sensor in the 50MP-100MP range. The Redmi K70 Pro, leveraging Xiaomi’s image processing algorithms, may prioritize color accuracy and dynamic range. The iQOO Neo9S Pro might lean towards a more vibrant, social media-friendly aesthetic. Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) will be crucial for video recording and low-light performance on both devices. The presence of a dedicated telephoto lens, and its magnification level, will be a key differentiator.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, complemented by 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 cores and 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, plus 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 cores. This contrasts with the iQOO Neo9S Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) featuring a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores. The Dimensity 9300+’s all-performance core configuration *could* translate to higher peak scores in CPU-intensive tasks, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s more balanced architecture and Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU typically excel in sustained gaming performance and thermal management. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration will be critical. The Snapdragon’s mature software ecosystem and optimization are also significant advantages.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 120W wired charging, a significant advantage over slower-charging competitors. The Redmi K70 Pro claims 100% charge in 18 minutes, while the iQOO Neo9S Pro achieves 40% in 9 minutes. This suggests the iQOO may initially charge faster, but the Redmi K70 Pro’s overall charging curve might be more efficient. Battery capacity is unknown, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s improved power efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the Redmi K70 Pro, resulting in comparable real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro if you prioritize incredibly fast 120W charging and are comfortable with potentially needing to monitor thermal performance during extended gaming sessions. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prefer a more refined, consistently high-performing experience with a chipset known for its gaming prowess and broader software compatibility, even if charging takes slightly longer.