iQOO Neo9S Pro vs OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and blazing-fast charging, the iQOO Neo9S Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset offers a performance edge, and the 120W charging is significantly faster than the OnePlus 12R’s 100W. However, the OnePlus 12R counters with excellent battery life and a slightly more refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 20 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8 mm or 8.3 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 40% in 9 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | V2339FA | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro
- Faster 120W charging
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- Battery life potentially lower than OnePlus 12R
- Camera system details unknown, potential compromises
OnePlus 12R
- Excellent 14:32h battery life
- High peak display brightness (1181 nits)
- Established software ecosystem
- Slower 100W charging
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 slightly behind Dimensity 9300+ in raw CPU power
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R features a display capable of reaching 1181 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo9S Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, iQOO typically focuses on high refresh rates and color accuracy. The OnePlus 12R’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor users. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate scaling rather than variable refresh rates for power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for the iQOO Neo9S Pro are unavailable. However, given iQOO’s focus on value, it’s likely to feature a capable main sensor, potentially around 50MP, but may compromise on ultra-wide and telephoto lenses. The OnePlus 12R’s camera system is expected to prioritize versatility. Image processing styles will likely differ, with OnePlus leaning towards more natural colors and iQOO potentially favoring more vibrant, saturated images. Without specific sensor details for the iQOO, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Neo9S Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+, featuring a unique core configuration with one 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, three 2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores. This contrasts with the OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, which employs a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 configuration. The Dimensity 9300+’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds suggest a performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the Dimensity 9300+'s architecture is expected to deliver improved efficiency. The OnePlus 12R benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software integration, potentially mitigating some of the raw performance gap.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R boasts a strong battery performance, achieving 14:32 hours of active use. The iQOO Neo9S Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 120W wired charging significantly outperforms the OnePlus 12R’s 100W, reaching 40% charge in just 9 minutes and 100% in 26 minutes for the OnePlus. This charging speed advantage is a major draw for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While the OnePlus 12R’s longer battery life is beneficial, the iQOO’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro if you demand the absolute fastest performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if minimizing charging time is a top priority. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize all-day battery life, a more established software ecosystem, and a slightly more balanced overall experience, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.