iQOO Neo9 vs Poco F5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the iQOO Neo9 is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. However, the Poco F5 Pro offers a fantastic balance of features, including excellent battery life and fast charging, making it a strong contender for those seeking value and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9 | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 27 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8 mm or 8.3 mm | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 40% in 9 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black, White |
| Models | V2338A | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 290 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo9
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor for top-tier performance
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Battery life potentially lower than Poco F5 Pro due to more powerful processor
- Display specifications largely unknown
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Excellent battery life (99h endurance rating)
- Versatile charging options (67W wired, 30W wireless)
- Bright and well-calibrated display (1059 nits)
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Wired charging slower than iQOO Neo9
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a bright display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo9’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable brightness level given its positioning. Both phones feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, potentially impacting power consumption compared to adaptive refresh rate displays. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the iQOO Neo9, but the F5 Pro’s display is generally considered to be well-calibrated.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests the Poco F5 Pro likely features a more mature camera system, potentially with better image stabilization. The iQOO Neo9’s newer chipset *could* offer improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range, but this is speculative without further data. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this price range is often a marketing gimmick and unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The iQOO Neo9’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X2 – and higher clock speeds (3.2GHz vs 3.0GHz), translating to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Neo9’s CPU configuration (1+2+2+3) is also more balanced than the F5 Pro’s (1+3+4). While both chipsets are built on a 4nm process, the architectural improvements in the Gen 2 offer better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The iQOO Neo9 will likely excel in demanding tasks like video editing and high-end gaming.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro’s endurance rating of 99 hours suggests excellent battery life, despite not specifying the battery capacity. The iQOO Neo9’s battery capacity is unknown, but its more powerful processor will likely consume more power. The F5 Pro offers versatile charging options: 67W wired (50% in 15 minutes), 30W wireless (50% in 32 minutes), and PD3.0/QC3+ support. The iQOO Neo9 counters with an impressive 120W wired charging (40% in 9 minutes) and reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge other devices. While the F5 Pro’s wireless charging is a convenience, the Neo9’s significantly faster wired charging could be a deciding factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9 if you demand the absolute best Android gaming performance and want a phone that will remain powerful for years to come. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, fast charging speeds (including wireless), and a more balanced overall experience without sacrificing significant performance.