iQOO Neo9 Pro vs. ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra is the superior choice. While the iQOO Neo9 Pro’s 120W charging is incredibly appealing, the nubia Z60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a significant performance uplift and demonstrably longer battery life (14:04h active use) making it the more well-rounded flagship.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro | ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2024, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2024, August 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8.0 mm or 8.3 mm | 164 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 246 g (8.68 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, MyOS 14 (International), MyOS 14.5 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED, dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 50 MP, f/1.8, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 12 MP, under display |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L2+L5), GLONASS (G1+G5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Black, Silver |
| Models | I2304 | - |
| Price | - | About 730 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Shorter battery life compared to the nubia Z60 Ultra
- Older generation processor
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor for peak performance
- Exceptional battery life (14:04h active use)
- PD3.0 and QC4 fast charging support
- Slower charging speed than the iQOO Neo9 Pro (80W)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but given the flagship positioning of both devices, we can assume high-quality panels. The nubia Z60 Ultra, historically, has prioritized screen technology, often featuring high refresh rates and color accuracy. The iQOO Neo series typically focuses on a balance of performance and display quality. Without specific data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but nubia’s track record suggests a potential edge in display fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are missing, but both phones likely feature multi-camera systems. However, the absence of sensor size information prevents a meaningful comparison. Given the nubia brand’s focus on photography, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO Neo series typically prioritizes overall value, so its camera system might be slightly less advanced.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial leap over the iQOO Neo9 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Gen 3 features a new Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4 GHz, compared to the Gen 2’s 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3. Furthermore, the Gen 3 utilizes a revised CPU architecture with 3x Cortex-A720 cores and 2x Cortex-A720 cores, offering improved efficiency and performance compared to the Gen 2’s A715/A710 configuration. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher sustained frame rates in demanding games. The nubia Z60 Ultra will demonstrably outperform the iQOO Neo9 Pro in CPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The nubia Z60 Ultra’s 14:04h active use score is a significant advantage. While the iQOO Neo9 Pro boasts incredibly fast 120W wired charging (50% in 11 minutes), the nubia Z60 Ultra’s superior battery life mitigates the need for frequent charging. The nubia Z60 Ultra’s 80W charging with PD3.0 and QC4 is still respectable, but slower than the iQOO. However, the longer runtime provided by the more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and potentially larger battery capacity (unspecified) makes the nubia Z60 Ultra the winner in overall battery endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and are looking for a high-performance phone at a potentially lower price point. You’ll benefit from the 120W wired charging, getting you back to 50% in just 11 minutes. Buy the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading if you demand the absolute latest processing power and longest battery life. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and its 14:04h active use score make it ideal for power users and gamers who need sustained performance.