iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Redmi K70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a noticeable performance uplift over the 8 Gen 2 in the iQOO Neo9 Pro, justifying the price difference. While the iQOO boasts competitive 120W charging, the K70 Pro’s newer chipset delivers a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8.0 mm or 8.3 mm | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | I2304 | 23117RK66C |
| Price | - | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Excellent performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Fast 120W wired charging
- Older generation chipset
- May lack the latest display technology
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Likely superior display technology
- Potentially faster 0-100% charging
- Higher price tag
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices are expected to feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays, specific details like peak brightness and panel technology (LTPO) are missing. However, given Xiaomi’s recent track record, the K70 Pro likely incorporates a more advanced panel with potentially higher peak brightness and more efficient LTPO implementation. This would translate to better outdoor visibility and improved battery life. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the K70 Pro may have a slight edge in screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi typically equips its 'Pro' models with larger sensors and more advanced image processing. It’s reasonable to assume the K70 Pro will feature a more capable main sensor, potentially with a larger aperture for improved low-light performance. Both phones likely offer optical image stabilization (OIS) on the primary lens. The iQOO Neo9 Pro may focus on a more vibrant, saturated image profile, while the K70 Pro might aim for greater accuracy and detail. We can safely assume both will omit truly useful features from 2MP macro lenses.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, a significant step up from the iQOO Neo9 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) and its 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3. The K70 Pro also benefits from newer Cortex-A720 performance cores, offering improved efficiency and sustained performance. The 8 Gen 3’s architectural improvements, combined with potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, will result in noticeably quicker app loading times, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games. The iQOO Neo9 Pro remains a powerful device, but the K70 Pro represents a generational leap.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 120W wired charging, but the K70 Pro claims a full charge in 18 minutes, while the Neo9 Pro reaches 50% in 11 minutes. This suggests the K70 Pro’s charging implementation is more efficient, potentially delivering a faster 0-100% charge despite the same wattage. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the K70 Pro’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software could translate to longer real-world battery life, even with a similar or slightly smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro if you prioritize a slightly more affordable price point and are satisfied with top-tier, but not *leading-edge*, performance. It’s ideal for users who enjoy demanding mobile games but don’t necessarily need the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you demand the best possible Android performance currently available, are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, and appreciate faster overall system responsiveness.