iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14 Pro emerges as the superior choice. While the iQOO Neo9 Pro offers excellent value, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Xiaomi 14 Pro provides a demonstrably faster and more efficient experience, justifying the price premium. The addition of wireless charging further enhances the 14 Pro's versatility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8.0 mm or 8.3 mm | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | I2304 | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | - | About 650 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
- Excellent value for the performance offered
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Industry-leading Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- 50W wireless charging for added convenience
- Likely superior camera system with advanced features
- Higher price point
- Wired charging takes slightly longer to reach 100%
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays, the provided data doesn't detail specifics like resolution or peak brightness. However, given Xiaomi's track record with flagship displays, the 14 Pro likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially more advanced LTPO technology for variable refresh rate control, leading to improved power efficiency. The iQOO Neo9 Pro, while still excellent, will likely target a more competitive price point, potentially resulting in slight compromises in display quality.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications. However, Xiaomi typically equips its 'Pro' models with cutting-edge camera technology, including larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. Given the 14 Pro’s flagship status, it’s reasonable to expect a larger main sensor, more sophisticated optical image stabilization (OIS), and potentially a variable aperture. The iQOO Neo9 Pro will likely offer a capable camera system, but it may not match the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We anticipate the Xiaomi 14 Pro to excel in dynamic range and detail capture.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant architectural upgrade over the iQOO Neo9 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Gen 3 features the newer Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, compared to the Gen 2’s 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3. More importantly, the Gen 3 utilizes a revised CPU configuration with 3x Cortex-A720 cores and 2x Cortex-A720 cores, offering improved multi-core performance and efficiency. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. The iQOO Neo9 Pro remains a powerful device, but the Xiaomi 14 Pro holds a clear advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones support 120W wired charging, with the iQOO Neo9 Pro claiming 50% charge in 11 minutes and the Xiaomi 14 Pro reaching 100% in 18 minutes. This suggests the Xiaomi 14 Pro may have a slightly larger battery capacity to fill, but the charging speed remains comparable. The Xiaomi 14 Pro further differentiates itself with 50W wireless charging (100% in 40 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater convenience and versatility. The iQOO Neo9 Pro only offers reverse *wired* charging, limiting its wireless charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro if you prioritize maximizing performance-per-dollar and require incredibly fast 120W wired charging without the added cost of wireless capabilities. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance available in an Android smartphone, value the convenience of 50W wireless charging, and are willing to invest in the latest Snapdragon technology.